Meh
I didn't like it...badly animated and pretty boring... it also wasn't very funny...I think u tried to hard... practice...that's all i can say...
Meh
I didn't like it...badly animated and pretty boring... it also wasn't very funny...I think u tried to hard... practice...that's all i can say...
Problematic
Problem #1. As the first episode in a series, watching this gave me no desire to view the next few episodes you hopefully won't make.
Problem #2. The voices sounded like some guy talking to his twin brother on a walkie talkie.
Problem #3. The only things that were "animated" were the mouths. Everything else involved fliping the characters.
You said the first one was "graphically retarded"... yeah right, I'm REALLY sure you changed that.
There are alot of other problems that hopefully you have the mental capacity to figure out for yourself.
I've seen worse...
Well for one thing I can see why this has not got a very good score.
Not only did 'Where's Wally' go out of the craze about a century ago but I fail to see the 'where's wally' theme hardly at all.
Graphics were awful and looked either too MS Painted or something that a child could draw.
The only slightly funny element was the voice acting, and only because that too was terrible.
Overall it gave me a chuckle because of the terrible voice acting, I've seen far worse but this is in no way great.
You have just been reviewed by
~T_C
where's wally is just as popular now as it has ever been....:)
the graphics may not be up to your pristine disney standard, but at least im trying, and maybe my ms paint is out of date, but when have you been able to do alpha transparency, vector )or straight) lines and gradient fills in ms paint ?!? and guess what...i am a kid !
the voice acting is supposed to be terrible, its more student brit humor, but it works for some people.
This was remastered?
Holy hell, I'm scared to see the first
That took...two of you.
Um...ok :D