00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Raphbull just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Animal Puncher

October 25, 2011 –
November 20, 2017
This entry was deleted.

Here is its eulogy, a collection of the kind words written about it while still among the living. They shall live on forever in its place.

Author Comments

Update: I think a lot of you are too quick to judge this game without finishing it. If you still hate it after you've seen the ending, then feel free to leave a nasty review.

Do you think there is an animal heaven?

Soundtrack by Fancy Mike & NoFateNet.
Game by Austin Breed.
Sponsored by Newgrounds.com.

Reviews

what the fuck is wrong with you?????
this is cruel, stupid, there's no argument, only free animal violence
you must burn in hell for this

i can at least tell you tried to make it good. i ges it's just me or something i just find game were it's more of an interactive story whith no adeo to be a little to teedeus and i don't like reading a lot so ya. but lisson you have what it take to make a great game. just keep homeing your skills and comeing up with new ideas.

I find it interesting how you tried to combine multiple game mechanics here. There is an element of story type games, quick time events (when punching at animals and not rocks/trees) and the type of game where you build up a bar, but stop when someone looks. Not sure what that mechanic is called, but it's popular in hentai games.

However, all three of these mechanics sort of represent the most boring options for a game. when used in a game, each one of them must be coupled with something else, like a story where the player can actually effect the story line, a mix of quick time and action/platforming elements, or....well....boobs. This game offers none of these incentives. It basically is a combo of the boring parts of three games.

I would say that next time, focus on fewer gimmicky mechanics, and invest the rest in creating something that would make players want to play the game.

Subject matter wise: I agree with most other posters here that it seems like your being edgy for the sake of being edgy. which isn't very edgy at all. edgy. edge.

you know there's such thing as a vet, right? If the animals were evil, then I'd have seen why they wanted to kill it, onlt a souless person would kill an innocent animal without checking at the vets and seeing whether they need too or not.

I liked the way the game looked, great artistic skill and all. Problem being, you kinda just had a moment of being on the internet with no real holds against you. I find it nice that you can make flash, It's great that you can make art, but Come now, did you really need to make a game as bad as this one? between everyone else who reads this and me, you could have made some sort of, last-man-standing kind of game form the artwork you see at the loading screen. It could've been about two friends, and the other dude coulda still been psycho. As for this game, You were either high or drunk. maybe both. but to think that this would actually be a great game was a little bit off in the "I wasn't thinking dept."

All in all... two stars. Mainly because the artwork was nice. the game just sucked,a dn I know you guys can do better. I wouldn't be so cruel if I didn't actually think you could do better.

Credits

Stats, Info & More

Score
3.50 / 5.00