At 11/14/03 01:49 AM, B-MAN wrote: I wonder what the look on Wade's face was when he finally got tired of this crap.
Probably the usual smiling face. Something like....
I emailed Wade and he said:
"If a crap entry is blammed and the author resubmits it without any changes you could blow the whistle on it as malicious. Just put in your description "movie was resubmitted after being blammed with no change"
or something.
Regards,
Wade Fulp
Newgrounds.com, Inc."
So there you have it, I was unsure, so I thought that other people might want to know. Hope this helps cos I am sick of crap movies being constantly resubmited on the portal.
Thanks
I see alot i mean alot of these type of moives in the portal.
GOOD get rid of all that crap no need to take up space eh!
at long last!!!i was getting pretty pissed off by a guy cant remember his user...he sent a crappy "Toast!"flash and i kinda blammed it for 3 times!i e mailed the user and he said its none of ya buisness haha its teh end of this now im happy!
Say, wasn't it like a billion years ago (okay, maybe not that long) that during the time when Newgrounds first implimented the "Blamming" system or something that somebody complained that it would encourage users to submit crappy entries for the sake of earning blamming points.
I think Wade responded to that as saying there's nothing wrong because it's just basically nothing more than feeding sharks free food or something like that.
Now it seems the situation is different, so basically to the sharks he's telling them "No soup for you!". Not that I am complaining or appreciate this new policy, I just brought this up as an observation.
wikki wikki wak
ive been lookin 4 to blam stuff
an im still lookin lol
Yeah, I'd rather just see a lot more 'free save points' where the movie is so good it demands saving.
"Also be sure to check out the Top 50 Sticker Orders list we recently put up! There's plenty of room on the list for some big sticker orders!"
Shameless advertising, shameless! :D
thank god, about time something is done to stop this crap!
God Damnit this makes me made id hope they god damn die
hey do you think that it is okay blow the whistle on movies that are just absolute shit
I think free blam points exist whenever a picture is shown instead of film.
Just showing the letter "B" in a picture might qualify as spam flash.
Anyway, don't worry about getting less blam points. There are still tons of bad movies (mostly stick movies) submitted each day. They are usually people less experienced in Flash than others.
although i like getting blam points like that, i really wish people would quit making crap like that and also re-submitting it after its been blammed before. i wish people would get more good flashes out there. this message doesnt apply to people who actually try and end up not making a good flash, there are many who try and need help, but they will improve
At 11/14/03 05:07 PM, twateater wrote: hey do you think that it is okay blow the whistle on movies that are just absolute shit
It depends, are thay trying to get there movie blammed? Does it show? If's it's just crap and has low effort in it, just blam it. Now if thay keep submiting the same stuff, email wade about it.
so theres going to be more whistle blowing too. What if it doesnt violate the Free Blam Pionts! rule but is just a piece of crap and not intended for a blam piont but gets blammed away can ya still whistly blow. Oh my I am rambling on I'll finish it now
Yes I think suicide is funny and I am sick of pretending its not.
eX(Wi/Ht? #45)
hey i blew the whistle on this one movie and it had a nude guy in it and i havnt gotten the whistle point yet im angry
|+~*Dillon is in the parking lot and he looks disgruntled*~+|
At 11/15/03 01:00 AM, DJIPX wrote: Yep. blammed and blew a few tonight. LOL.
yeah same here! hey? how is everyone tonight?
So... I guess we blow the whistle for unsuitable? Hmm, maybe I can finally get some whistle points now. I think I've seen quite a few pop-up spawning flashes, but they appearantly don't affect Macs so I wouldn't know...
Good idea, Wade. I just hope people don't go overboard and get their whistle levels lowered to garbage.
At 11/15/03 01:08 AM, wheels_751 wrote:At 11/15/03 01:00 AM, DJIPX wrote: Yep. blammed and blew a few tonight. LOL.yeah same here! hey? how is everyone tonight?
Good, getting high and recovering from having my wisdom teeth out.
i do agree with you there wade, but the points are helpful, but not a challenge to judge
Personally i think this should have been taken care of a long time ago and i dont think a user should get 2 chances either, they're using this site for free and ruining it by disregarding the rules that they originally agreed to follow.Thats my opinion, but i think its great what your doin tryin to stop that bull sh*t.Keep up the good work.
At 11/15/03 01:39 AM, SNAFUequalsONE wrote: Personally i think this should have been taken care of a long time ago and i dont think a user should get 2 chances either, they're using this site for free and ruining it by disregarding the rules that they originally agreed to follow.Thats my opinion, but i think its great what your doin tryin to stop that bull sh*t.Keep up the good work.
AGREED!
well maybe ppl shud get 2 chances if they just suck with flash. then again, i know nothing obout flash seeing as how ive never attempted to createt somthing with it but i am a newgrounds veteran and i have seen sum pretty bad shit out there and these ppl wud have been in deep shit if we go with no 2nd chance
At 11/15/03 02:31 AM, Kenshin_Himura123 wrote: well maybe ppl shud get 2 chances if they just suck with flash. then again, i know nothing obout flash seeing as how ive never attempted to createt somthing with it but i am a newgrounds veteran and i have seen sum pretty bad shit out there and these ppl wud have been in deep shit if we go with no 2nd chance
WTF are you talking about? This isent about banning people who are bad at flash.