At 10/16/11 01:07 PM, Scarface wrote:
Oh, I'm not at all saying that private churches should be forced to perform gay weddings. I'm just saying that legally, there shouldn't be an issue.
Shouldn't being the key word. However, there is.
With regards to the idea of choice of churches to preform the ceremony, I reluctantly agree with the idea that churches would be able to decide. However, it would have to happen on one condition: Secularisation. The problem stands that if you call gay marriage a civil partnership, it's still different to a marriage, even if it's only in name. This creates a perception that civil partnerships are different (and therefore inferior) which leads to homophobia. If secularisation does not happen, then the church is seen to have more power than they really deserve in a post-modernist society, one characterised by choice.
Hopefully, with more secularisation and legalisation of the government for churches to preform gay marriage (NOT civil partnerships) which is equal in every way to heterosexual marriage, this will create competition among the churches who realise they're a symbol of an age long gone. Although I'm surprised the government hasn't lifted marriage out of the hands of the church and into the hands of the state.