At 12/4/04 02:44 AM, biteme2514 wrote:
In between schoolwork, watching as many movies as I do, trying to start a new screenplay and me quite possibly having a girlfriend now, I've been sorting out my priorities and Newgrounds is one of the things I had to cut. Besides, everyone else in those threads is doing much better than me stat-wise so I figured I'd quit while I was still ahead. Don't worry; I'm not going to disappear or anything. I'm still racking up blam/protect points whenever I can, right?
Yep. Better than nothin'. Here's hoping you find it easier to juggle shit in the future, though. :::holds up imaginary glass:::
Oh, and as for me sounding a little elitist, that's just me being passionate about something. I just don't think Shrek 2 belongs in the same category with Fellini and that's the way it is. Sorry for sounding like a jackass there but I'm just sounding off. I have pretty strong opinions about things I like and dislike. Makes me sound a little narcissistic at times, I know, but it's who I am, you know? Still, I apologize.
I never said it belonged in the same category. I said there is art and there is entertainment, and both have their place within the larger realm of movies/film. Many people use the word film to refer to the former and the word movie to refer to the latter, in fact. The makers of Shrek 2 weren't seeking to produce a great film that would stand alongside the century's best, so... don't blast them for producing a pop culture satirical movie with some fun in it. That's what they were setting out to do, yanno? If you don't think it was as funny as the original Shrek or something, as I seem to recall you may not have... that's a different matter, and a much more valid criticism because it doesn't attempt to compare apples to oranges.
Now, to get into the movies I've seen since my last post here. There's eight of them and five of them are listed, bringing me up to having seen 87/250 movies off The List. Nothing compared to gfoxcook having seen exactly half the list, but I'll work my way up there.
Oh, I can assure you I'd seen less than 87/250 when I first got on IMDB around the time I was 18 or 19 or so. Keep in mind that the makeup of the top 250 was very very different back then (and that I didn't have access to IMDB when I was 16, as I didn't get online until I was 17, in 1994).
I personally owe a lot to my friend, Derek Lam, who I was in the Foreign Film club with during high school... were it not for him, I don't think my love for various films and movies would be as far and wideranging as it is today.
So, to start off, let me just say that I finally got around to watching One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest.
Excellent choice.
I still think he was at his best in Chinatown.
I've seen Chinatown 2 or 3 times and OWOTCN only once, so I don't feel comfortable comparing them that much.. but needless to say from that statistic, I do loves me teh Chinatown.
Psycho's a personal favourite now
It's okay... better than the Birds. But my fave Hitchcock films have to be Rope, Rear Window, North by Northwest, and Vertigo, in more or less that order (if you haven't seen Rope, you must see it... it's an experiment with insanely-lengthy single-shot cinematography, and features a great premise, too... it's constrained by being set in a single manhattan apartment, but that's part of the charm).
Hm... come to think of it, those might be the only 6 I've seen. Need to see... MORE... MORE HITCHCOCK!
I had so many people telling me that Election was a good movie that I just kind of broke down and got my chick friend -- calling her my girlfriend still seems kind of odd to me for some reason -- to rent it for us to see. And see it we did. She didn't think it was anything special either. It kind of reminded me of Rushmore actually. Maybe that was the reason I didn't like it so much. There's just something about underdog movies that I can't quite stand. Even though, technically, all protagonists are underdogs in their respective stories, but I'm sure you all know what I mean.
I saw Election BECAUSE someone compared it to Rushmore. And on that basis, I was somewhat disappointed. Broderick is great in movies like the Freshman and Ferris Bueller, but he isn't exactly a great stand-in for Rushmore's Jason Schwartzman (Max) and Bill Murray (Herman). Plus, the crotch-washing scene is funny but nothing you'd find in a Wes Anderson film.
Speaking of Wes Anderson, my fellow Houstonian (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0027572/)... Bottle Rocket, Rushmore, and the Royal Tenenbaums is about to be joined in quirky comedic genius by the Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, which kinda follows up on the Jacques Cousteau angle from Rushmore (if you don't remember, Max had a book about him that linked him to his crush because her husband was a seaman or whatnot).
Wes Anderson co-wrote it with some new guy instead of Owen Wilson, and I've heard that the writing isn't as good as that of the other films, BUT... it's got Bill Murray, Owen Wilson, Cate Blanchett, Anjelica Huston, Willem Dafoe, Jeff Goldblum (wearing an "I'm a pepper!" t-shirt, no less!), Bud Cort, and so on and so forth. Now tell me that you can resist a cast like that! Anyway, I'll refrain from REALLY pushing it on ya till I've seen it for myself, but it comes out X-mas day and you can be assured I'll be seeing it before 2004 has died.
The Graduate is my favourite Hoffman role to date and is now on my mental Top 10 List. The Graduate's just hysterical though:
Graduate is good indeed. But regarding that bit about underdog movies... man, you say you don't like Election and Rushmore because they're underdog movies... but you liked--no, LOVED--the Graduate? Do you not think Dustin Hoffman's character was nearly the ultimate 60s underdog?! Crikey. "PLASTICS, man! PLASTICS!" in his ear as he grows disillusioned and jumps underwater in the swimming pool. And I might point out the numbed-Bill-Murray-underwater-in-the-swimming-pool scene in Rushmore (an intentional homage, I assure you!).
Stories of disaffected youth and being torn between apathy and idealism and so forth... pervade much of cinema, and as you kinda pointed out, turn many a film into so-called "underdog movies." The underdog, if you hadn't discovered yet, IS the everyman. And that's why he's often the protagonist, to be our eyes in the world of any particular film that he is suited to deliver us.