At 12/5/07 04:37 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: http://blurple.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash

Vick him!

I don't get it.

:I feel stupid.

At 12/5/07 04:55 PM, Jeff-Studios wrote:

At 12/5/07 04:37 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: http://blurple.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash

Vick him!

I don't get it.

I feel stupid.

To kill; derived from Michael Vick after an incident in which he was arrested and banned for killing dogs.

Wasn't this submitted yestarday?

I looked but i cant find it anywhere, i googled it too are you sure your not confusing it with this .
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/28 5077 Tts called attack of teh zombies very simlair name.

At 12/5/07 06:11 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: I looked but i cant find it anywhere, i googled it too are you sure your not confusing it with this .
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/28 5077 Tts called attack of teh zombies very simlair name.

It is malicious. I remember playing it yestarday. Except you had to unlock the shotgun. Maybe it got blammed.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 3339 i found this in the graveyard diffrent name same game?

All of them but I think they dont count though...spam alt

I not sure your meant to mark them pm to a mod

I THINK Apple Tree might be abusive, but I'm not sure.

I've said this before but I'll say it again. "If your not sure don't flag!". It's only one point.

All three.
All three.
All three.
H-h-h-heliopios.

At 12/5/07 06:36 PM, CruzAzul-19 wrote: All of them but I think they dont count though...spam alt

Lmao all those reviews are 0/20, looks like we have 20 people who didn't learn their lesson from the last batch of spam alts :X

thank you CruzAzul for the link though, I've reported him :)

Hopefully this account will be terminated shortly before everyone gets a garbage whistle and freaks out on the mod team again ¬_¬

At 12/5/07 07:15 PM, BlueHippo wrote: At 12/5/07 06:36 PM, CruzAzul-19 wrote:

All of them but I think they dont count though...spam alt

Lmao all those reviews are 0/20, looks like we have 20 people who didn't learn their lesson from the last batch of spam alts :X

thank you CruzAzul for the link though, I've reported him :)

Hopefully this account will be terminated shortly before everyone gets a garbage whistle and freaks out on the mod team again ¬_¬
oh shit i marked them all hope i dont get garbage whistle

At 12/5/07 07:15 PM, BlueHippo wrote:

At 12/5/07 06:36 PM, CruzAzul-19 wrote: All of them but I think they dont count though...spam alt

Lmao all those reviews are 0/20, looks like we have 20 people who didn't learn their lesson from the last batch of spam alts :X

thank you CruzAzul for the link though, I've reported him :)

Hopefully this account will be terminated shortly before everyone gets a garbage whistle and freaks out on the mod team again ¬_¬

WHO MADE ANOTHER FUCKING SPAMALT? DO I HAVE TO REPOST IT SAYING DON'T EVER MAKE A FUCKING SPAMALT?

No more caps, but if it is another spam alt, which it will most likely be, then whoever made it should get a fucking garbage whistle. Maybe even go back to level 1 as another punishment.

You decide.

For the sake of you all, and for the sake of the BBS drama that would unfold, I too hope he's deleted before anyone gets a garbage whistle, last time was ridiculous. OMG. GARBAGE WHISTLE CREW!! ASKKKSDJJFKKKkD@@@@@

Pretty much....

I'm not gonna clear those reviews, I'm gonna wait for action to take place... however I can not speak for the entire mod team.

Let this be a warning to you all once again, just be careful about users trying to score whistle points any way they can. The correct thing to do is to post the account here, and one of us will try to deal with the situation... however, people don't tend to pay attention and will flag just about anything posted in this thread :/

:(

At 12/5/07 06:36 PM, CruzAzul-19 wrote: All of them but I think they dont count though...spam alt

Holy shit.
Wait why wouldn't these count?
I marked them all.

At 12/5/07 07:30 PM, BlueHippo wrote: just be careful about users trying to score whistle points any way they can.

I always am.

The correct thing to do is to post the account here, and one of us will try to deal with the situation...

I just report via PM.

however, people don't tend to pay attention and will flag just about anything posted in this thread :/

I pay attention, I'm not gonna mindlessly flag everything thats posted--thats stupid.

XTheNavigatorX
maggot7588, Dark-Trilby
Doomfire50, Ryan-is-my-Emo-Lover
barelyxbeautiful, ewr123, Badcore, The-Blode
RileyFreeman25, wjmiller132, MIR-hybrid
Leon401, DarkSarafan

I DON'T GET IT!
How are those reviews not abusive (white power ones)?
They just say "LOL" "White Power"

Foamy's Rant II, Pico: Blammin' the Baddie, Meet Pico Clock!

At 12/5/07 07:51 PM, Littleluckylink wrote: I DON'T GET IT!
How are those reviews not abusive (white power ones)?
They just say "LOL" "White Power"

Because it was just a spam alt that was ment for whistle points, but it actually decreases your points so never flag spam alts.

Her account been delted, so no worries my whistle level stll the same.

At 12/5/07 07:51 PM, Littleluckylink wrote: I DON'T GET IT!
How are those reviews not abusive (white power ones)?
They just say "LOL" "White Power"

Because those reviews were probably made so that someone somewhere could score some whistle points. It's possible it was just a spammer, but there's no real way of knowing.

Whistle blowing shouldn't be stat whored like it is now, it should be to PROTECT NEWGROUNDS against malicious users writing bad reviews.

Yes, technically the reviews were abusive, however termination of the account is more appropriate than just removing all the reviews, and giving all 20 users butt-loads of points. Action was taken on the user, their account was terminated...

Just uhhh, report spam accounts in the future, don't mass flag them.

I hope that cleared some things up, but I'm not sure if it did... heh :X

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /413611
lavidaloki

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /413617
kudoco

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /413630
supertoria12

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /413644
Jechal
Not much, but it doesn't have to be.

At 12/5/07 08:04 PM, BlueHippo wrote:

At 12/5/07 07:51 PM, Littleluckylink wrote: I DON'T GET IT!
How are those reviews not abusive (white power ones)?
They just say "LOL" "White Power"

Because those reviews were probably made so that someone somewhere could score some whistle points. It's possible it was just a spammer, but there's no real way of knowing.

Whistle blowing shouldn't be stat whored like it is now, it should be to PROTECT NEWGROUNDS against malicious users writing bad reviews.

Yes, technically the reviews were abusive, however termination of the account is more appropriate than just removing all the reviews, and giving all 20 users butt-loads of points. Action was taken on the user, their account was terminated...

Just uhhh, report spam accounts in the future, don't mass flag them.

I hope that cleared some things up, but I'm not sure if it did... heh :X

Penilyzing us for flagging them would not be the right thing to do. It's better if they just got deleted and there wouldn't be any points taken away or any given points. Well that's what I think, and I'm sure other people think this too.

At 12/5/07 08:18 PM, CruzAzul-19 wrote: Penilyzing us for flagging them would not be the right thing to do. It's better if they just got deleted and there wouldn't be any points taken away or any given points. Well that's what I think, and I'm sure other people think this too.

Well the thing is we can't delete the reviews without giving you all points for flagging, unless we alert an administrator and the take care of the culprit with termination.... thus removing all the horrible reviews, and the spammer in the process. That way you all don't get any penalty OR gain from it, just keeps you even :)

At 12/5/07 08:21 PM, BlueHippo wrote:

That way you all don't get any penalty OR gain from it, just keeps you even :)

So, it just acts like we never flagged them in the first place, right?

Go Fish!!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /317913
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /320296
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /276534
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /378086
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /64427
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /278736
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /408495
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407586
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /411500
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /28740
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /30752
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /393505
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /384700
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /215989

At 12/5/07 08:31 PM, firemario1 wrote:

At 12/5/07 08:21 PM, BlueHippo wrote:

That way you all don't get any penalty OR gain from it, just keeps you even :)

So, it just acts like we never flagged them in the first place, right?

Yes. Exactly.