I noticed some people give flashes a zero without even looking at it.
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/2 He gives the author a low score because of the replies the author gives
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/6
First one, he insults the author's work
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/8
On the futurama quiz he gives him a zero and says that the SS will ban him
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/9
Bottom one, he has a conversation with another user (I assume)
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/13
Kill Kyle 1, he says the author needs plastic surgery
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/17
Second one, he talks about joining their forum and gave Alien Hominid a zero just to get a reply.

Look for reviews where a person gives a flash a zero just to get a reply, which I think is against the rules anyway.

unclejimbo86

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 3380

At 8/13/08 08:36 PM, Chdonga wrote: I noticed some people give flashes a zero without even looking at it.
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/2 He gives the author a low score because of the replies the author gives
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/6
First one, he insults the author's work
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/8
On the futurama quiz he gives him a zero and says that the SS will ban him
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/9
Bottom one, he has a conversation with another user (I assume)
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/13
Kill Kyle 1, he says the author needs plastic surgery
http://david.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h/17
Second one, he talks about joining their forum and gave Alien Hominid a zero just to get a reply.

Look for reviews where a person gives a flash a zero just to get a reply, which I think is against the rules anyway.

Honestly, i don't find these as abusive, i would consider them as useless, you must learn to identify them, personally, those kind of reviews took me down to garbage twice before, so check out some of the flash guides available, they may be useful even if they don't look like it.
Good luck, and if you flagged them already, maybe you buried yourself even more in garbage, so be sure to check them out, as well as the FAQ.

At 8/13/08 08:59 PM, Solraczeravla wrote: Honestly, i don't find these as abusive, i would consider them as useless...

Most of the reviews people mention are actually useless but you don't need to break people's balls for it.

At 8/13/08 09:05 PM, Chdonga wrote:

At 8/13/08 08:59 PM, Solraczeravla wrote: Honestly, i don't find these as abusive, i would consider them as useless...

Most of the reviews people mention are actually useless but you don't need to break people's balls for it.

I'm just telling you, so you don't make the same mistake once and once again, tough, you consider it as an offense, i don't see why.

At 8/13/08 10:10 PM, TECh2o wrote: I'm not sure, but this seems a little suspicious.

Nope, not abusive.

Sweet, thanks alot Rage. This is a great idea. =D

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 3617
xavix438

I dunno if you can flag this somehow...but it's retarded.

OMG AUTO INZURANCE FTW

At 8/14/08 01:43 AM, MoreJosh wrote: I dunno if you can flag this somehow...but it's retarded.

OMG AUTO INZURANCE FTW

I dont think so tis on there userpages, so it wont be much good posting it here its a spam scheme.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/18 9571 - The one with the picture, you will see it lol.

Osama Hide! (stolen)
One Night Stand (blam)
The Fruit Bunch (blam)
Your Screwed (blam)

Check the turd of the week there is heaps of abusive reviews....

It's CC Day
The top two

At 8/14/08 06:09 AM, xIDoL wrote: It's CC Day
The top two

Nice finds, thanks : )

Aww man! I accidentyly clicked the flag for abuse instead of a useless review! damnit! Hopefully they dont charge me too much for it!

i still have a garbage whistle and im flagging a bag full of abusive reviews.

At 8/14/08 06:21 AM, MyBlacker wrote: i still have a garbage whistle and im flagging a bag full of abusive reviews.

The goal is not to flag tons of reviews but to flag only the reviews that you find 100% abusive. For instance, the reviews that call the author a name, that says BLAM, blam it/this piece of crap, and so on, advertise other sites or claim explicitly that the flash or the audio is stolen. You can also check those two Abusive Review Guide :
*Abusive Review Guide .
*Abusive Review Guide 2.

I hope this will help you to get out of your Garbage Whistle !

At 8/14/08 07:14 AM, sonofkirk wrote: The goal is not to flag tons of reviews but to flag only the reviews that you find 100% abusive. For instance, the reviews that call the author a name, that says BLAM, blam it/this piece of crap, and so on, advertise other sites or claim explicitly that the flash or the audio is stolen. You can also check those two Abusive Review Guide :
*Abusive Review Guide .
*Abusive Review Guide 2.

I hope this will help you to get out of your Garbage Whistle !

yea, i only flag those kind of reviews. and i already watch those tuts and follow every single thing said in to it.

At 8/14/08 07:18 AM, MyBlacker wrote:

At 8/14/08 07:14 AM, sonofkirk wrote:

yea, i only flag those kind of reviews. and i already watch those tuts and follow every single thing said in to it.

You will get you normal whislte soon.

joymeat

At 8/14/08 08:17 AM, ThatNut wrote: joymeat

Nice find dude. Check this guy's other reviews. =>
Link and the donuts (blam)
Naruto Mini Loituma (blam)
Space Destroyer!!!1 (blam)
The one for Night Light may be abusive but I'm not sure.

Grey Bullet Interactive (blam)
Sailormoon hentai (blam)
Kroenen's Lab of Gears (blam)
RCC Tales (blam)
PICONJO: The Epic Kiss 14 (blam, don't flag the one for Tobacco's Secksings, it's too old)
Ultimate Naruto Fanflash5 (blam)
*OLD*Stick Weiser (blam)

Remember that you can flag reviews from the three past years. All these reviews are 05,06,07,08 reviews so it's ok.

Have fun !

At 8/14/08 08:26 AM, sonofkirk wrote: Nice find dude. Check this guy's other reviews. =>
Link and the donuts (blam)
Naruto Mini Loituma (blam)
Space Destroyer!!!1 (blam)
The one for Night Light may be abusive but I'm not sure.

They're all on the same page, why didn't you just post 1 link instead of pretending you found loads of reviews.

At 8/14/08 09:12 AM, sonofkirk wrote: Remember that you can flag reviews from the three past years. All these reviews are 05,06,07,08 reviews so it's ok.

No, Absent announced that the date doesn't matter anymore. You can flag all abusive reviews now.
Thanks for the links.

http://aarda22.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash
more spam in the portal reviews to flag

At 8/14/08 09:21 AM, Racoonmario wrote:

At 8/14/08 09:12 AM, sonofkirk wrote: Remember that you can flag reviews from the three past years. All these reviews are 05,06,07,08 reviews so it's ok.

No, Absent announced that the date doesn't matter anymore. You can flag all abusive reviews now.
Thanks for the links.

Actually recently loads of people just got garbage from a high level whistle for flagging old reviews.

Only flag 2005 reviews to 2008 reviews or you're most likely going to lose points.

At 8/14/08 09:17 AM, Phil wrote:

At 8/14/08 08:26 AM, sonofkirk wrote: Nice find dude. Check this guy's other reviews. =>
Link and the donuts (blam)
Naruto Mini Loituma (blam)
Space Destroyer!!!1 (blam)
The one for Night Light may be abusive but I'm not sure.

They're all on the same page, why didn't you just post 1 link instead of pretending you found loads of reviews.

I don't pretend I found a lot of abusive reviews (ThatNut found the link) ... I just clearly organized these reviews ...

At 8/14/08 09:22 AM, Phil wrote: Actually recently loads of people just got garbage from a high level whistle for flagging old reviews.

Only flag 2005 reviews to 2008 reviews or you're most likely going to lose points.

Now that is a shame. But maybe those reviews weren't abusive?
Alas, we shouldn't flag old reviews then.

At 8/14/08 09:22 AM, perfect-insanity wrote: http://aarda22.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash
more spam in the portal reviews to flag

Hell yeah, golden nugget.