protections rank, number, name -- as of 05/05/2003 at 01:11 CDT
01 9,590 ramagi
02 8,335 RyoHahn
03 6,073 thisisasignin
04 5,534 fixit
05 5,488 DrMSM
06 5,174 poxpower
07 5,012 Bila
08 4,799 Stormwarden
09 4,568 Recon_Rebel
10 4,481 NemesisM66
11 4,128 TheJoe324
12 4,040 gfoxcook
13 3,974 vuorimies
14 3,903 HeRetiK
15 3,771 helldoll81
16 3,670 HAQnSPITT
17 3,408 Mr_Chuckles
18 3,354 CTTcrew_l2edfoX
19 3,318 the_phantom_spancker
20 3,298 alexsmolik
21 3,199 _altr_
22 3,170 Ppk3000
23 3,150 XwaynecoltX
24 2,990 Toocool100
25 2,988 kevr1
26 2,980 chaotic1
27 2,948 agent66
28 2,880 Dark00Stir-fry
29 2,802 Mike277
30 2,664 Mystboy
31 2,657 Captain_Bob
32 2,655 staphita
33 2,655 Drimarki
34 2,626 leeboy105
35 2,564 Newgrundling
36 2,485 format
37 2,448 Crono-
38 2,445 lordfril
39 2,441 GSX_Boy
40 2,324 Hice
41 2,274 XkwiziTOnE
42 2,272 _redruM_
43 2,203 innphernoe
44 2,139 arrows_eleven
45 2,122 PratT
46 2,116 YoinK_The_Destroyer
47 2,081 DarkJaymz
48 2,028 fr0gt0e
49 2,018 nimmer
50 2,017 skum001

hey i'm all most on that list =P

At 5/5/03 03:29 AM, _lightning_ wrote: hey i'm all most on that list =P

you were on it a few weeks back, but you weren't protecting enough so you got passed. #;-}>

At 5/5/03 03:31 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/5/03 03:29 AM, _lightning_ wrote: hey i'm all most on that list =P

you were on it a few weeks back, but you weren't protecting enough so you got passed. #;-}>

o well i'll just blaim that on my vacation =P

At 5/5/03 03:35 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 5/5/03 03:31 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/5/03 03:29 AM, _lightning_ wrote: hey i'm all most on that list =P

you were on it a few weeks back, but you weren't protecting enough so you got passed. #;-}>

o well i'll just blaim that on my vacation =P

Then how do you explain the fact that you got knocked off the top 50 protectors list BEFORE you went on vacation? Heh... don't worry about it. Just rack up a few more and you'll be set. Skum001 hasn't gotten any points in months, for one thing.

At 5/5/03 03:59 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Then how do you explain the fact that you got knocked off the top 50 protectors list BEFORE you went on vacation? Heh... don't worry about it. Just rack up a few more and you'll be set. Skum001 hasn't gotten any points in months, for one thing.

well if i'm low in the save list just means that i'm getting higher in the blam list =P btw how do you get all this information?? do you look in every one's profile every day?? =)

At 5/5/03 10:01 AM, arrows_eleven wrote: It's all about the blams.

Yeah, but you're ranked 44 out of 300,640 users. Trade all of 'em in for blam points if you could, wouldn't you?

At 5/5/03 10:01 AM, arrows_eleven wrote: It's all about the blams.

and why do you think that?? =)

At 5/5/03 09:27 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 5/5/03 03:59 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Then how do you explain the fact that you got knocked off the top 50 protectors list BEFORE you went on vacation? Heh... don't worry about it. Just rack up a few more and you'll be set. Skum001 hasn't gotten any points in months, for one thing.

well if i'm low in the save list just means that i'm getting higher in the blam list =P btw how do you get all this information?? do you look in every one's profile every day?? =)

Unless you aren't getting any blams EITHER, of course. So get on it, damnit! #;-}>

Once I made the list, I just go to everyone's profile who's on it (not everyday silly, maybe twice a week tops), update the numbers in an excel file, and then reorder the list with cut and insert if necessary and I have a new order. My excel file has much more info than I pasted here (protect rank, name, protects, blams, total points, blam/protect rank from the top50 list (or profile if the person isn't on the list right now), rank level # (i.e. 14 for sergeant major), and rank name, with a bit of a colour code.

I'm the highest person below a Praporshchik on the protect list. :::nods:::

At 5/5/03 10:01 AM, arrows_eleven wrote: It's all about the blams.

So if you were given the choice between having 10,000 blams AND 10,000 protects or having 15,000 blams but NO protects, you'd take the latter?

Besides, if you had even 20,000 blams and 0 protects, I think Wade would be on your ass so fast you couldn't blink.

And anyway, judging from your recent (past week or two) entry onto my top 50 list, I'd say you're doing just fine on protects whether you want to or not. #;-}>

btw gfoxcook do you have a blam top 50?? =P

At 5/6/03 10:06 AM, _lightning_ wrote: btw gfoxcook do you have a blam top 50?? =P

Nope. Here's an easy way to get an idea of how good your blam number is, though. If you're on both the top 50 list and my top 50 protectors list, look at the numbers. I'm 26 on the top 50, for instance, and 12 on the protectors... so... I could take a wild guess from that and say my blam rank is probably around 26 + 26-12 = 40.

Similarly, if you're 40 on the top 50 list but only 50 on my protectors list, you might be around 40 - 50-40 = 30 or so.

The reason I made the list in the first place is that I have way more protects than most people do, and more protects than blams, so I wanted to see how I stacked up against all those people with nearly 10,000 blams but very little protects. Clearly, pretty well, when it comes to protects. I'll be passing Nemesis pretty soon, and he's #3 on the overall top 50. :::nods:::

Whoooo I have a rank..............on the top 3,389 Protectors........I'm last:P

At 5/6/03 02:09 PM, Gyftos13 wrote: Whoooo I have a rank..............on the top 3,389 Protectors........I'm last:P

Actually, the majority of NG users have far less than 45 saves, so you're pretty high up on the list. But still nowhere near the top 50, alas. #;-}>

That list looks an awful lot like the top50 blams and saves list if you ask me. But I'm higher on this one! WOOT! I was #7 at one point on the blams/prot, good times... but then that bastard, Fixit passed me, and then, I slacked off ( and still am) and Drmsm has also passed me.

BTW, where did you get that info?

And I have a 300 popularity but I haven't submitted any games.... Who loves my profile and looks at it everyday?? :P

The info... He got it the same way the top50 list of blams/saves did

your a hippy

At 5/7/03 10:09 PM, nappyass123 wrote: your a hippy

And you're a spammer.

At 5/7/03 02:47 PM, poxpower wrote: That list looks an awful lot like the top50 blams and saves list if you ask me. But I'm higher on this one! WOOT!

Not really. After Ramagi and then RyoHahn, it's all different. And besides, I'm ranked #11 now, I believe (just passed TheJoe), but on the top50 I'm #24. That's quite a difference, IMO.

Here's the actual top 50 list rankings in the order of the top 50 protectors list, so you can see how out of order they are from each other:

1
2
5
7
8
9
10
4
15
3
6
27 - me
14
13
12
11
19
34
33
31
16
39
29
91
22
28
47
26
42
45
21
24
23
43
32
46
17
18
44
25
53
68
36
38
61
41
30
50
20
35

that's from the same data as the first post in this thread, however, and as such is almost 72 hours old.

I was #7 at one point on the blams/prot, good times... but then that bastard, Fixit passed me, and then, I slacked off ( and still am) and Drmsm has also passed me.

I noticed. I've been tracking the info since mid March. You and those two are much more active than most in the top 10, aside from Ramagi and RyoHahn, of course. If you're not careful, though, HellDoll and Recon are gonna pass ya. #;-}>

BTW, where did you get that info?

As I said about 6 posts up from yours:

"Once I made the list, I just go to everyone's profile who's on it (not everyday silly, maybe twice a week tops), update the numbers in an excel file, and then reorder the list with cut and insert if necessary and I have a new order. My excel file has much more info than I pasted here (protect rank, name, protects, blams, total points, blam/protect rank from the top50 list (or profile if the person isn't on the list right now), rank level # (i.e. 14 for sergeant major), and rank name, with a bit of a colour code."

At 5/7/03 10:09 PM, nappyass123 wrote: your a hippy

You like to say that dont you, you are spamming there guy.....

Yeah, that's all great, but how did you make the first top Saviours list? Is there something I don't know here? Or did you simply rearrange the top50 people in a new order ( I haven't looked at it closer).

At 5/8/03 03:56 AM, poxpower wrote: Yeah, that's all great, but how did you make the first top Saviours list? Is there something I don't know here? Or did you simply rearrange the top50 people in a new order ( I haven't looked at it closer).

he looked at allot of peoples profile is that so hard to get?? =P

At 5/8/03 08:14 AM, _lightning_ wrote:
he looked at allot of peoples profile is that so hard to get?? =P

I got that for the update of his list, but what if he could have asked Wade or Liljim for an actual list or something from the NG database? That's possible, you know. Lot less time wasted that way, but I guess if he's bored, he can do whatever the hell he wants he click on as many profiles as he can.

At 5/8/03 03:56 AM, poxpower wrote: Yeah, that's all great, but how did you make the first top Saviours list? Is there something I don't know here? Or did you simply rearrange the top50 people in a new order ( I haven't looked at it closer).

I went through all 50 profiles, I put them in the excel file, reordered based on saves instead of total points... I also looked at profiles of people who HAD been on the top 50 but had been knocked off to see if any of them should be in the top 50 saviors. And whenever I noticed someone with around 2000 saves on the BBS, I made a shortcut to their profile. Since they're not on the top 50 list, I have to have shortcuts so I can find them again to reupdate their saves.

It really didn't take all that long, and yes, I was bored that day. heh. Updating it takes a lot less time than the original creation though, yes.

"only" 30 more points to be on the list =P

holy shit!!!!!! this isnt jsut TOP 50 PROTECTION LSIT

ITs also top 50 NGers without a life. MUAHAHA

At 5/11/03 10:37 PM, AsiaNsKyTrancE wrote: holy shit!!!!!! this isnt jsut TOP 50 PROTECTION LSIT

ITs also top 50 NGers without a life. MUAHAHA

Uh... huh...

Apparently you're lacking a life as well, since your habitat is listed as "Heaven." When'd you die?

In any event, your comment doesn't make sense. Saves and blams take the same amount of time to get, so why would only the top 50 saviors need a life? Perhaps you were making a misguided attempt at a slam on the time wasted by people on the top 50 combined list, this list, and hell, the top 50 blammers list, which doesn't exist to my knowledge. In any event, it didn't work, pal. Work on your spelling, too (mostly referring to your other post in the blam/protect thread... did you say shit in that post or did you MEAN to say "sits"? Eh... the world may never know).

At 5/12/03 12:14 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Apparently you're lacking a life as well, since your habitat is listed as "Heaven." Work on your spelling, too (mostly referring to your other post in the blam/protect thread...

Go gfoxcook!! You da man!!

i should be in the list now =)

I never rally pay much attention to number of blams or saves..Maybe cause no matter which way you make the list I am at the top. In about 300+ blams I will have more blams than total points for all but one person.
I guess I try to catch HAQnSPITT total points with only my saves. See I have motivation.