if you look at the bottom of every newgrounds screen it says newgrounds copyrighted 1995-2006 no 2007 wow
New grounds not copy righted!!!
968 Views | 22 Replies
At 2/6/07 08:28 PM, wadethejuggalo wrote: if you look at the bottom of every newgrounds screen it says newgrounds copyrighted 1995-2006 no 2007 wow
WE AREN'T SAFE!!! WE ARE IN MORTAL DANGER!!
This was done in 2006 2005 2004 2003 and so on.
PhilipAchapman@gmail.com Add me on MSN
I realise my use of the comma is pretentious as fuck, but it's habit.
Thanks to Mr. MuffDiver for the sig.
Calm down, who cares? Wade or Tom will fix it sooner or later.
Thats old, someone noticed that in early January
it's been said before.
No one is stealing NG and it will be updated after the site has been redone.
And just like that....he was gone...
At 2/6/07 08:33 PM, 0peth wrote: it's been said before.
No one is stealing NG and it will be updated after the site has been redone.
Yeah, you stupid shits...
At 2/6/07 08:34 PM, Aliensandwich wrote:At 2/6/07 08:33 PM, 0peth wrote: it's been said before.Yeah, you stupid shits...
No one is stealing NG and it will be updated after the site has been redone.
Can everyone stop acting like their the Grand Intelligent Newgrounds Messiah because they know something someone else doesn't?
And just like that....he was gone...
At 2/6/07 08:36 PM, 0peth wrote:
their
**they're.
And just like that....he was gone...
That copyright notice is strictly for cosmetic reasons, it has no legal ramfications.
At 2/6/07 08:38 PM, 0peth wrote:At 2/6/07 08:36 PM, 0peth wrote:**they're.
their
OOO, in before the correction. lol
Gotta get my cream in Wisconsin
Party Room Suite at the Sheraton
At 2/6/07 08:39 PM, Gendo wrote: That copyright notice is strictly for cosmetic reasons, it has no legal ramfications.
DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER
At 2/6/07 08:41 PM, jonthomson wrote:At 2/6/07 08:39 PM, Gendo wrote: That copyright notice is strictly for cosmetic reasons, it has no legal ramfications.DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER
Huzzah! I win for having a basic understanding of copyright law!
At 2/6/07 08:42 PM, Gendo wrote:At 2/6/07 08:41 PM, jonthomson wrote:Huzzah! I win for having a basic understanding of copyright law!At 2/6/07 08:39 PM, Gendo wrote: That copyright notice is strictly for cosmetic reasons, it has no legal ramfications.DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER
Yeah. Better would have been to have said that the copyright would have arisen automatically once the page was created and said notice means precisely nothing, but there you go.
At 2/6/07 08:44 PM, jonthomson wrote:
Yeah. Better would have been to have said that the copyright would have arisen automatically once the page was created and said notice means precisely nothing, but there you go.
I believe my bland explanation was in before his.
And just like that....he was gone...
At 2/6/07 08:46 PM, 0peth wrote:
I believe my bland explanation was in before his.
You didn't explain anything.
At 2/6/07 08:47 PM, jonthomson wrote:At 2/6/07 08:46 PM, 0peth wrote:I believe my bland explanation was in before his.You didn't explain anything.
Srsly, Zach, you said relatively nothing.
At 2/6/07 08:46 PM, 0peth wrote: I believe my bland explanation was in before his.
Its ok, I still love you.
At 2/6/07 08:41 PM, jonthomson wrote: At 2/6/07 08:39 PM, SenorPresidente wrote:That copyright notice is strictly for cosmetic reasons, it has no legal ramfications.DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER
hmmm yes thankyou
At 2/6/07 08:31 PM, jonthomson wrote: You're all idiots.
Except me.
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
I'm gonna jack Newgrounds, then sue Tom. Ftw.
bro at me come
