At 7/30/06 10:55 PM, Durin413 wrote:
1 American soldier is worth more than the lives of over 1000 iraqi civilians.
*slaps face*
You dont defeat an insurgency with that kind of attitude. With that attitude you spawn an Empire.
At 7/30/06 10:24 PM, mynamewontfitin wrote:
Unavoidable civilian deaths, simple as that.
No, they were very avoidable. They could have been avoided if Israel took the high road instead of declaring war on Lebanon for the actions of irregulars. Ya know, the unconditional ceasefire thing everyone seems to be talking about, even Hezbollah.
The war was very avoidable and you keep sidestepping that by decrying collateral damage. They both escalated. Both. This is another case of a Franz Ferdinand blowing up into full scale, fully mobialized, warfare. Its like, hey, shit, we already got these jets up there, might as well use em.
You think Hezbollah would have survived the international beating and scrutiny they would take if they randomly decided to start lofting tens, let alone hundreds, of rockets a day into Israel for no reason? No. Israel gave them an excuse and empowered them. Foolishly.
At 7/30/06 09:03 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote:
You don't think bombing methods of transporting war materiel (yes, this IS the real word) is advisable? It's not war, but it is a conflict against a group highly dependent upon outside imports and quick movement.
Apparently my links are always ignored and you keep posting the same crap. Show me one instance where declaring war on a tactic, terrorism, has ever worked. Show me one instance where declaring full scale war on irregulars in the modern era has worked. One. Please.
PS, we are losing control of Afghanistan, if we ever did indeed have control of it.
At 7/30/06 07:38 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote:
Israel has cause to defend itself. 1500+ rockets launched at its cities, what WOULD YOU DO?!
BEFORE OR AFTER THEY ESCALATED THE WAR?!?!?!
I dont remember reports of 100 rockets landing in Israel before they bombed Lebanon. I dont remember Haifa getting nailed before this. Funny, you are justifying the war by the actions that the war brought out.
At 7/30/06 02:56 PM, Judge_Dredd wrote:
A weak UN is the cause of these problems!
You dont need a strong UN to defeat anything, you just need nations acting in unison together and not like Europe and the world against America/Israel/GB. We stood up to Iran in unison and North Korea in unison. Which brings me to another point. Iran may be secretly loving this because it took all the heat off them. They are yesterdays news and no one cares so they have more time to build their nukes. Good going, Israel.
*thumbs up*
At 7/30/06 01:27 PM, Dragon_Smaug wrote:
Anything Israel does will help Hezbollah’s PR.
RONG
At 7/30/06 11:08 AM, HighlyIllogical wrote:
Islamofascism.
I hate that word. I hate it with a passion. Whatever idiot came up with it deserves a beating. Since when does radical Islamism have anything to do with fascism? And do we really need to make words up just so we can label them?
I bet it was Rove. That motherfucker is to good at his job. Hell, maybe even Carville helped him make it.
At 7/30/06 12:02 AM, Dragon_Smaug wrote:
Yeah...um...taking land in a defensive war is not really stealing. It's actually legal under international law.
Ummm, I am almost positive thats BS. Source it.
At 7/29/06 09:00 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote:
As long as Israel doesn't plow through like the US did on the way to Baghdad, they'll be able to root out many terror cells.
No, thats not why there is terrorism in Iraq. If you actually think if we went slow we would have solved terrorism, you are sorely mistaken.
And stop claiming Afghanistan is equivalent to Lebanon. Its not. I have asked you to make the case, you havent. So stop echoing the same crap.