Lara17: No. No I don't. You got off to a really shit start here. Might improve over the time, but I don't do doubles, and for now, you suck.
At 4/4/06 12:10 PM, -Paradox- wrote: Lara17: No. No I don't. You got off to a really shit start here. Might improve over the time, but I don't do doubles, and for now, you suck.
That's not so nice :'(
At 4/4/06 12:10 PM, -Paradox- wrote: Lara17: No. No I don't. You got off to a really shit start here. Might improve over the time, but I don't do doubles, and for now, you suck.
I disagree there. She seems to be one of the only decent new members. She's using correct english (or trying too) without having to me told. YOU ARE WRONG, IS WHAT YOU ARE, PARADOX.
At 4/4/06 12:10 PM, -Paradox- wrote: Lara17: No. No I don't. You got off to a really shit start here. Might improve over the time, but I don't do doubles, and for now, you suck.
Hang on, she's new, and isn't being an idiot.
Cut her some slack.
At 4/1/06 06:03 AM, -Paradox- wrote:At 4/1/06 05:19 AM, JimmyDodger wrote: I knew I forgot something. I just know I did! The pancakes are our God. But I do like it when you talk dirty, you rebel you. I prefer the term bum-chums though.Bum-chums? Never heard that one before. But I was having a joke either way, just stick to what I originally said, ok?
I was joking. I see the joke went....not right. Ok, so I'm gonna go now..
*Runs away*
I would appreciate the effort to evaulate based on personal opinion if your like me or not.
sockpuppetclock
At 4/4/06 12:35 PM, Kickme123 wrote: I disagree there. She seems to be one of the only decent new members. She's using correct english (or trying too) without having to me told. YOU ARE WRONG, IS WHAT YOU ARE, PARADOX.
Look, I can't be biased just because they're new, if she wanted to be liked, then maybe she should have waited a bit, so she could lurk around to see how to be like the ones which are more liked. I wasn't trying to be harsh, I was just giving correct analysis.
At 4/4/06 12:39 PM, Practical wrote: Hang on, she's new, and isn't being an idiot.
Cut her some slack.
Like I just said, it would be unfair to all the other people who I didn't like if I just said I liked her, it was actually her own fault. But hey, maybe I'll be fair and give her some time to improve, then I might do her again. :)
Anyway...
bigexplosions: You're cool, sometimes a little wierd, but hey, nobody's perfect.
At 4/4/06 12:35 PM, Kickme123 wrote:At 4/4/06 12:10 PM, -Paradox- wrote: Lara17: No. No I don't. You got off to a really shit start here. Might improve over the time, but I don't do doubles, and for now, you suck.I disagree there. She seems to be one of the only decent new members. She's using correct english (or trying too) without having to me told. YOU ARE WRONG, IS WHAT YOU ARE, PARADOX.
Thank you : ), you are very nice!!! : )
Big kiss!!! ~xXx~
At 4/4/06 12:39 PM, Practical wrote:At 4/4/06 12:10 PM, -Paradox- wrote: Lara17: No. No I don't. You got off to a really shit start here. Might improve over the time, but I don't do doubles, and for now, you suck.Hang on, she's new, and isn't being an idiot.
Cut her some slack.
Thank you too!!! Please give me some time : )!
Big kiss for you too!!!
~xXx~
I don't know if i posted or not (i do it all the time in these kind of threads), but i'll post anyway. Just beacuse i don't know if you like me. You do, don't you? ;(
k but don't judge me by my name and if ur american don't judge
Frostbreath: I like you a lot, some over-decent posts. Great.
games-porn: You haven't even got 10 posts, but if I was to guess, I'd hate you. Stupid name, offense to Americans (I'm not one by the way), and you picture spam. Good enough? Hell no.
piemold: Eh, you're alright, sometimes a little wierd, but you do good sometimes.
just freakin rate me. its aright really *smiles pleasently*
angel_of_doom6: *Looks at posts*... *Waits for 5 minutes*... *Looks at posts again*... *waits for an hour*...
No.
I suppose I should give a reason. They're short, and have no meaning most of the time. But there is room to improve.
Kirajufan: You're pretty good, and I'm not just saying this because I'm in a good mood.
-Magnum-: You're alright, sometimes a bit of a noob, but despite tht, I like you anyway.
monkeynipples: You can do much better, buddy. At the moment, NO. You're too silly and muck around way too much with really short posts.
At 4/6/06 11:49 AM, monkeynipples wrote: hehe 2 much pepsi sorry :P
Are you sure that's what it was?
What about me? Why am I asking some kid who could be 13, or some old man who could be around 40? I guess I could check your profile, but those sometimes lie, aaand I\'m just too lazy. I look 4 shrtcts. Get it?! Arrharharharrrr... Yeah, I\'ll lazilly blame my attitude on my ADD. How like me.
So uhhh, do you like me?
kromeclutch: No. Most of your posts are flame-bait. Flaming = Complete Suckage. So no, I don't like you.
At 4/6/06 12:01 PM, -Paradox- wrote: kromeclutch: No. Most of your posts are flame-bait. Flaming = Complete Suckage. So no, I don\'t like you.
I guess it depends in what mood I am. I never expect any of these quickly thought up posts to ever catch on or be taken seriously. You get me?
LordSkeletor: Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. Just over average probably.
At 4/6/06 12:57 PM, -Paradox- wrote: LordSkeletor: Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. Just over average probably.
Eat yo' birthday caik.
At 4/6/06 01:30 PM, ShameOnPretzel wrote: Was I judged yet? Eh?
I think I remember doing you somewhere, if not, tell me and I'll judge you.
ShameOnPretzel: No, I never did you, so I'll do you now. You're a fairly good user, sometimes a little stupid, but hey, this is Newgrounds. Lol. I like you.
