Hm... first you say this, seemingly ending your posting on this matter:
At 3/20/05 03:15 PM, C_A wrote: Enh, just forget anything I've posted here. I don't have speaking privileges anyway.
But... then you can't resist saying this to my LAST longwinded explanation to you:
At 3/20/05 03:33 PM, C_A wrote: I just don't want this to go as needlessly extreme as banning.
You don't deserve any further explanations if you can't get the FOUR previous ones into your brain. Banning isn't needlessly extreme. BANNING IS ALL REVIEW MODS CAN DO. It is our ONLY option. We cannot delete reviews. Only admins can. The admins entrust us to stop people who are making abusive reviews so that THEY can choose what to do with them (delete the bad reviews, unban them, keep them banned, delete their account, etc. etc... those are some of the options).
I no longer care if you understand or not. If you can read the above paragraph and still think your banning was "needlessly extreme," then I pity you.
Oh, and stop pushing your luck or you'll be banned here on the BBS, as well, though from your postcount, that probably wouldn't be such a big deal to you. That might explain your behaviour on this page of level up!. I just hope you're not the type to get sick pleasure out of this. If you genuinely just want to go back to reviewing and wish you hadn't gotten banned: stop complaining to me and start behaving better in the future. EDN.
gfox // wi/ht?#9 // defunct PentaList (final update: 3/15/2008) // Cyberdevil's HexaList!
a long, long time ago: 60000 b/p (#2) // 36000 blams (#3) // 24000 saves (#1)