Somebody hands you a Rubiks Tesseract and asks you to solve it.
How fucked are you?
4D Rubiks
4,195 Views | 30 Replies
At 12/12/11 02:31 AM, Stereocrisis wrote: This is the worst thread I've ever been into. Ever. ANYWHERE.
I'm going to spice it up with my presence, but there is only so much my charm will do to save this shit.
This is a cookie-cutter response that you could have placed into any thread anywhere, and it would have fit. For all i know you clicked on a thread and pasted this without reading it. You are therefore irrelevant and worthy of being ignored.
Since it doesn't exist I wouldn't be too fucked. But, if it did the algorithm for solving one would be similar to a plain ass rubik cube so not very fucked at all.
At 12/12/11 06:00 AM, escobargames wrote: they can't hand you a tesseract lol, it can't fit in this dimension, its like trying to fit a horse in a water bottle
I know what my science experiment for next week is now!
Try solving one of these.
I bet your brain twitches just with the very thought.
My Youtube channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/fuzzum1 11
If you get a ban, it was totally worth it. 10/10, I love you. -Skaren
A normal Rubik's Cube is 3x3x3 with a stationary middle cube.
A 4D equivalent would 3x3x3x3 with a stationary middle unit, and be confusing as hell to even look at.
Even a 2x2x2x2 (with no stationary piece) would be difficult to grasp.
A truly prophetic sig...
Fourth dimension is time, therefore, technically all rubiks cubes exsist in four dimensions.
Yeah, I'm lame.
*No longer PaperBoy, due to a technicality involving a 'missing' energy drink, I am now TiredBoy...
At 12/12/11 11:12 AM, fuzzum111 wrote: Try solving one of these.
I bet your brain twitches just with the very thought.
thanks for the headache.
At 12/12/11 05:01 PM, JoeMation wrote: Wrong. What you are referring to is Minkowski space. We do not fully understand the fourth dimen need less quote eory relating to the fourth dimension explaining spacetime. There are many people who believe the fourth dimension is physical, considering all this there are many theories.
Why can't we just have three dimensions and leave it at that?
I'd be very fucked. How do you even solve a Rubiks cube that you couldn't comprehend?
At 12/12/11 11:12 AM, fuzzum111 wrote: Try solving one of these.
I bet your brain twitches just with the very thought.
I've posted pictures of mine in the past. That's a gigaminx, costs around 100 bucks. That particular model is very difficult to turn, so it's more of a 1-solve "i did it, fuckers!" toy rather than something more durable like a standard megaminx.
I do in fact have a 4D rubix cube program, here's what it looks like. It's a 3D representation of a 4D object, hence why it's a hypercube. There's one side you can't see, but it unveils itself as you make turns. There are 5 dimensional cube programs as well, those are too difficult to comprehend
For the tougher 4D stuff like the megaminx (12 sides) look no further than the magic120cell
http://www.gravitation3d.com/magic120cel l/
You simply can't manually turn something like this - the turns would be in the millions! You have to create mathematical models, or macros, to turn chunks of it for you. Mind=blown stuff
At 12/12/11 07:26 PM, STEM wrote: For the tougher 4D stuff like the megaminx (12 sides) look no further than the magic120cell
http://www.gravitation3d.com/magic120cel l/
You simply can't manually turn something like this - the turns would be in the millions! You have to create mathematical models, or macros, to turn chunks of it for you. Mind=blown stuff
You have raped my mind so hard that I cannot figure out if that is blood or cum dripping out of my ear...
My take on a fourth dimension is that a 4D cube is a cube that has a density-like dimension. It would kind of be 3 cubes in one. It would have an inner and outer and a middle cube. Therefore there would be 18 faces of 9 squares but you could only ever see 6 faces at a time. You could switch between looking at the inner, outer and the middle cube. You would have to have a digital display on the cube as the squares could potentially swap with up to 18 different colours at a time. There would have to be a way that you could swap cubes between the inner and outer dimensions and I haven't got my head around that one yet.
I think Einstein would have already blown his load just thinking about the concepts mentioned here
Excuse me, I'm looking for a car that's been tricked out to look like an ice cream truck.
I could use a strapping young man to do some chores around the house!
AHHH! JACKPOT!
i would just try to work out the solution on a piece of paper, because it would be easier to do so in this hypothetical world, ( you can add as many dimensions as you like) and give up after about 30 minutes or so.
by the way, what are 4D rubiks?
inb4 solving the ordinary 3 dimensional problem within a specific amount of time, and wait until the time component satisfies the required coordinate.
At 12/12/11 11:12 AM, fuzzum111 wrote: Try solving one of these.
I bet your brain twitches just with the very thought.
How. The. FUCK?!
Check out my art. | Greatest thread ever | Zeus | C23 Abusive Review Code of Conduct
For Goa/Psy trance mixes click pic
