Hey I'm not sure if everyone knows about this yet or not, but this is actually real and the government will be attempting to pass a law censoring the internet, and I know my fellow newgrounds'ers will not be happy about this so check out this site and join the fight against it! I know these rarely ever have an effect, but we have to at least try! Don't let the government pull this crap!

American Censorship?!

oh boy, that means less cock jokes on NG. The internet is going to crumble.

At 11/16/11 12:49 PM, MrRager wrote: oh boy, that means less cock jokes on NG. The internet is going to crumble.

RUN!!

Not likely.

F**k you, f*****t!

Lol ... okay, buddy.

I'll be waiting in my RV fro anyone who wants to flee to Canada. You must bring your own aluminum hats and canned food. No electronics allowed.

At 11/16/11 12:50 PM, roderickii wrote: Not likely.

Not likely? Where have you been?

At 11/16/11 12:56 PM, Dogmeat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:50 PM, roderickii wrote: Not likely.

Not likely? Where have you been?

Oh guys, look, it's that 14 year old kid again.

That site seems a little bias to one side, I've not heard the other side yet nor even read the bill, it's a bit long, but if someone could summarise both sides of the argument and possibly the bill itself, I might be able to form an opinion of my own.

Aside from lolAmerica.

At 11/16/11 12:56 PM, Dogmeat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:50 PM, roderickii wrote: Not likely.

Not likely? Where have you been?

The real world.

At 11/16/11 12:57 PM, Sevkat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:56 PM, Dogmeat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:50 PM, roderickii wrote: Not likely.

Not likely? Where have you been?

Oh guys, look, it's that 14 year old kid again.

Who?

At 11/16/11 12:58 PM, Dogmeat wrote: Who?

You know, that really unfunny kid, Dogmeat.

At 11/16/11 12:59 PM, Sevkat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:58 PM, Dogmeat wrote: Who?

You know, that really unfunny kid, Dogmeat.

I'm still not getting you.

At 11/16/11 01:02 PM, Dogmeat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:59 PM, Sevkat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:58 PM, Dogmeat wrote: Who?

You know, that really unfunny kid, Dogmeat.

I'm still not getting you.

Oh wait, I think you said you were 19 on Stickam or some shit.
Either way.
Fuck you.

At 11/16/11 01:03 PM, Sevkat wrote: Oh wait, I think you said you were 19 on Stickam or some shit.
Either way.
Fuck you.

You're a very emotional person.

At 11/16/11 12:56 PM, Dogmeat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:50 PM, roderickii wrote: Not likely.

Not likely? Where have you been?

Well first off all we have much bigger concerns than the internet these days. Also this topic has come up so many times and no action has yet to be takin because it's not that freakin important. Also do you know how much of a shitstorm people would be in if Facebook/twitter is blocked?As trivial as it may seem some people LOVE social networking. Seriously it's not going to happen anytime soon, at least until the US decides don't have to worry about other countries civil rights imploding anymore.

Wat, for the first time I'm glad I don't live in the USA (=/= america)

At 11/16/11 12:58 PM, EmmaVolt wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:56 PM, Dogmeat wrote:

At 11/16/11 12:50 PM, roderickii wrote: Not likely.

Not likely? Where have you been?

The real world.

burn

Obama has a Facebook page himself, oh teh irony if this shit passes. :D

At 11/16/11 01:51 PM, RonjasSchatz wrote: Obama has a Facebook page himself, oh teh irony if this shit passes. :D

You actually fell for that.

If you censor the internet, you go to hell before you die.

Please.

I'm actually all for Internet Censorship. There should be boundaries to what people, kids can look at.

At 11/16/11 01:56 PM, Gagsy wrote: I'm actually all for Internet Censorship. There should be boundaries to what people, kids can look at.

I disagree parents need to take more responsibility then censorship wouldn't be necessary

At 11/16/11 01:56 PM, Gagsy wrote: I'm actually all for Internet Censorship. There should be boundaries to what people, kids can look at.

Fuck the kids! FUCK'EM!

At 11/16/11 12:51 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: No electronics allowed.

Does that include laptops? Otherwise, i see no reason to flee.

At 11/16/11 01:58 PM, roderickii wrote:

I disagree parents need to take more responsibility then censorship wouldn't be necessary

Unless you expect parents to watch everything their children do online then it's quite hard, especially as a lot of them know a lot lot less about computers and the internet than their actual kids do.

http://vimeo.com/31100268
This video sums things up. Theyre not going for porn or anything, theyre mainly targeting music and movies. If you so much as link to a youtube video of a song, or a video of a cover of a song. you can go to jail (im sure that has to be a very unlucky situation) but it is still possible. Its awful what companies like the RIAA are being able to do

At 11/16/11 02:13 PM, Gagsy wrote:

At 11/16/11 01:58 PM, roderickii wrote:

I disagree parents need to take more responsibility then censorship wouldn't be necessary

Unless you expect parents to watch everything their children do online then it's quite hard, especially as a lot of them know a lot lot less about computers and the internet than their actual kids do.

not all parents are ignorant to the internet. I mean kids are goin to see shit there not suppose to be seeing anyway. It's not that hard to make sure your child is mature and sane enough for potentially life scaring shit.

At 11/16/11 02:49 PM, roderickii wrote: not all parents are ignorant to the internet.

No, but in the early the now-times, most are. My dad knows how to get on Facebook and pay bills online. That's about it. Anything aside that? Forget it.

At 11/16/11 12:49 PM, MrRager wrote: The internet is going to crumble.

yes it is