At 6/1/11 07:35 PM, CheapTrick wrote:
At 6/1/11 06:35 PM, kakalxlax wrote:
You have the worst grammar i have ever seen in a review.
again grammar is not a reason, plus not everyones first langueage is english
English isn't my first language either and i write understandably.
He could be a bit new to the language. Either way, grammar and spelling, like he said, have nothing to do with it. If the review has constructive criticism is what determines it's deletion.
Still, i do believe it should be enforced stronger. Whilst, abusive or short reviews with no effort and give low scores are usually to be deleted. A shitty review like "LOL OMG THAT WAS TEH AWSUM!" will live on because it's a positive comment + high school. Even worse is that people would give a review like that a + simply because they agree with it, not because of it's content.
Very few people actually vote on a review as negative because it's actually a badly written review, more often than not, it's only because they disagree with it.
It's like going to someone very popular, like lets say egoraptor, someone gives a low score, they express their opinion, it's well written, not abusive, simply giving advice. That review would be bombarded by fanboys with negative votes, whilst the shitty ones with a high score would never be noticed by a mod.