Feminists believing that all men are stupid, sex driven, fat, lazy, and worthless.
Nevermind the fact that they dont want equal rights. They want MORE rights.
Feminists believing that all men are stupid, sex driven, fat, lazy, and worthless.
Nevermind the fact that they dont want equal rights. They want MORE rights.
Oh, and this is for saying the dumbest arguments, not discussing them
theism vs atheism war must GTFO
At 11/3/10 05:10 AM, RightWingGamer wrote: On the other hand, if you believe that Bush blew up the towers so he could have an excuse to invade Iraq for oil or some shit like that, you obviously need STRONGER pills.
what if i told you Bush blew up the towers with his government's Jew lasers because they were blocking the light from his home star? where are your pills now?!?!
THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
It's fucking stupid as hell, and panders to the extreme paranoia that all parents go through.
You can literally make that argument for fucking ANYTHING.
:(
GOD DAMMIT, HOW DID MY CIVICS TEACHER THINK THAT WAS A GOOD ARGUMENT? HE'S EDUCATED AND VERY WELL VERSED IN THIS WORLD. I WANT TO SLAP HIM WITH A 12 FOOT FISH IN THE FACE.
"What's your point?"
Dumbest argument ever. Just an idiot's means of trying to deter the guy who's point is perfectly clear to the other heads in the room except this individual just declared "What's your point?" with a room temperature I.Q. I guess that's even lower if you measuring in metric! That's what they're really saying is "You're using complex sentence structure and big words that confuse and scare me and I need you to dumb it down for me so I'm gonna be a Dick and say that instead."
Your Arrogance Will Be Your Undoing
Perfection Is An Illusion And Delusion Of Narcissists And Despots
It's Not Who You Were It's More In Who You Are And Who You Will Be
You might just get burned!
Ok so there's a news story. Guy gets molested by a priest as a kid. 30 years later he beats the shit out of the priest (who is now an old man). One guy was trying to argue that this would qualify as a hate crime and thus we should get rid of hate crimes.
How was it a hate crime? According to him the man beat the shit out of him because he was a pedophile thus attacking him for his sexual orientation.
At 11/17/10 02:32 AM, FatherTime89 wrote: Ok so there's a news story. Guy gets molested by a priest as a kid. 30 years later he beats the shit out of the priest (who is now an old man). One guy was trying to argue that this would qualify as a hate crime and thus we should get rid of hate crimes.
How was it a hate crime?
Because the guy obviously attacked the priest because he hated him.
Obviously *pfft*.
Need some music for a flash or game? Check it out. If none of this works send me a PM, I'm taking requests.
Anything that Glenn Beck has ever said,
and that Obama is a muslim from Kenya and he is trying to become the dictator of the United States and ''all of our freedoms are going to be taken away. He must be stopped immediatley.''
*facepalm*
"But I didn't know the gun was loaded! I took the clip out but it still went off! OH GAWD!!!"
surprised nobody thought of that sooner.
"We're hip, vicariously we won't wear a seatbelt when driving or riding in the car."
"We're hip, vicariously we won't wear a helmet or pads when skating."
At what point did being hip become finding a gogolplex of means to be reckless and irresponsible?
Your Arrogance Will Be Your Undoing
Perfection Is An Illusion And Delusion Of Narcissists And Despots
It's Not Who You Were It's More In Who You Are And Who You Will Be
At 10/9/10 07:01 AM, The-universe wrote: The person you're replying to is talking about the validity and accuracy of Fox news, not it's political stance. But nonetheless, let's have some fun.
The political stance of Murdoch doesn't affect the news segment? I mean that WAS his argument.
During the time when he created Fox News he was a conservative (due to his public support of Margaret thatcher)and made Republican Roger Ailes the CEO. He's been switching parties for years. But either way it doesn't sound like the actions of a "left-winger" right?
Um, no he wasn't. He supported Al Gore in 2000, Kerry in 2004, and Clinton in 2008. He may have supported a conservative at one point...but if he did, I was in single digits of age, and the internet wasn't recording that at that point.
Also if you want to argue semantics, he doesn't own Fox news. Fox news is owned by Fox Entertainment group. F.E.G is owned by News Corporation, which is a conglomerate and has many owners.
Who directly owns and operates Fox News? Rupert Murdoch. As acknowledged by the FCC, and the US government. But hey, slight of hand is fun!
Here's a fun one.
Mrs. X: "kids are getting more stupid".
Me: "Actually research called the flynn effects shows otherwise"
Mrs. X: "Are you a parent? No? Shut up then!"
It's not the lack of crimes that values your morality but your capacity for contrition.
"XYZ makes people violent." Because violence never existed before XYZ.
"You religious nuts...." Because if someone is religious, that automatically invalidates anything they said. Same for "You Democrats" or "You Republicans". Don't address the argument. Just the person.
"I disagree." Who cares. Back it up. Give some reasoning, stats, whatever. Try to argue. This isn't grade school. "You're wrong" isn't a valid argument.
"Fox News has a right wing slant."
At 12/2/10 06:06 AM, WolvenBear wrote: "You religious nuts...." Because if someone is religious, that automatically invalidates anything they said. Same for "You Democrats" or "You Republicans". Don't address the argument. Just the person.
Exactly! People need evidence by correlation that all (or at least most) religious people are corrupt. I suppose it depends on the religion, but if you classify all religious people as being responsible for the September 11th attacks or the Crusades or whatever, but listen to the individual's doctrine.
At 12/2/10 06:20 AM, Fluffington wrote: Anytime somebody says "Expert suggests", "Statistics says" or my all time favorite "Many people believes" without providing any source or links to back that up.
Exactly! Even after that you need to extensively read the research in order to understand the findings. Not just the experts conclusions, but also the raw data as much as possible.
I remember someone trying to argue that group (x) is better at (1) than group (y). He didn't even bother to do any research, so I did. I found out the samples were heavily sided, over 90% of the subjects were from group (x)! He didn't even state that in his findings he just made a mention of it in an interview.
It's not the lack of crimes that values your morality but your capacity for contrition.
At 12/2/10 10:12 PM, RacistBassist wrote: The BBT and evolution is wrong because if you put a wrist watch that was taken apart and put it in a bag and shake it for thousands of years it won't come out complete with the right time being read.
If you really want your head to explode with the most unbelivably bad arguments against evolution & Co, click here.
It's not the lack of crimes that values your morality but your capacity for contrition.
At 7/10/10 02:43 AM, FatherTime89 wrote: I'd like to add one more.
Men/children/teens are all complete idiots who cannot distinguish reality from fiction and thus they will slowly become violent/sexist/dangerous when they consume [insert media here].
This has been used against porn, video games comic books, rap rock and roll, crime novels, movies, TV etc. etc. etc.
Also used in porn with the implication that 'men are idiots who will think most women behave like strippers/are sex objects if they ever watch strippers'.
It's so head smackingly stupid
Well met indeed! Good on ya! That is one of the most trying aspects of the creative process as a creative individual I welcome anyone and everyone who refutes such an argument! As a creative individual I support any and all art forms no matter how controversial unless they're xenophobic. There are two things I, a creative individual cannot stand in any media outlet: Censorship and the Republican bias.
Your Arrogance Will Be Your Undoing
Perfection Is An Illusion And Delusion Of Narcissists And Despots
It's Not Who You Were It's More In Who You Are And Who You Will Be
At 11/1/10 02:53 PM, f-izzle wrote:At 9/23/10 01:48 AM, Iron-Claw wrote: "Barak Obama is a Nazi" Seriously what kind of moron would believe that? Everyone who's ever watched the History channel can tell you that's a load of shit! You see the nazis would never let him in. The nazis were all about filtering out what they deemed to be "inferior" Not Jewish, not gay, not having a mental illness, not gypsy, not inclined to speak out against the nazis, not Jehovah's witnesses, not a twin, not being white. They called it "Eugenics" I call it "Übercracker" I can say that, I'm German. That type of thing should never happen again.Saying:''Barack Obama is a nazi'' isn't an argument...
Oh and what you said that it's a bad argument because the nazis would have never let him in, is pretty stupid too. You shouldn't take it too literal.
I completely agree with it being stupid, since Obama doesn't have ANY characteristic of that of a nazi.
But your argument saying it is a dumb statement, is kind of dumb.
I wish you knew what you were talking about but you really don't. I have spent my whole natural life having to take shit from The Republican Party to have an exceptional understanding of them and I can tell you they are truly xenophobic, idiotic and arrogant enough to truly, honestly, literally believe such a statement to be true. I know. The Republican Party is the most xenophobic, idiotic and arrogant party on this planet called Earth with the exception of one: The Third Reich. Next time try actually reading the previous pages of a thread like you should if you had you would know this is a debate thread.
Your Arrogance Will Be Your Undoing
Perfection Is An Illusion And Delusion Of Narcissists And Despots
It's Not Who You Were It's More In Who You Are And Who You Will Be
At 10/9/10 03:34 AM, WolvenBear wrote:At 10/6/10 01:03 AM, Antimatter500 wrote: fox likes to call themselves "news" while only making chicken shit right wing editorial arguments, and purposefully scaring the living daylights out of people to make them conform.Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox news, is an ardant left winger. He has supported EVERY democrat candidate for president since the 70s. Claiming that a life long Democrat is scheming to tilt the news to the right is moronic.
that is not news.
/argument
No. Rupert Murdock is a Republican. I don't know who put that idea in your head but they are wrong and if you truly believe such you too are wrong. Rupert Murdock is no more a Democrat than Stephen Colbert is a Republican. For those of you who are grossly misinformed Stephen Colbert is a Democrat who takes on the persona of a Republican for the sole purpose of lampooning on The Republican Party! I am shocked at how little Republicans can or have picked up on this! The verdict is: Fox News it bad and Republican by the tab of 8 to 2. Fox News is indeed bad and Republican. Majority rules. That's Democracy.
Your Arrogance Will Be Your Undoing
Perfection Is An Illusion And Delusion Of Narcissists And Despots
It's Not Who You Were It's More In Who You Are And Who You Will Be
#1 communism is a perfect system it just doesn't work....
#2 republicans are always stupid and cause debt but obama fixes it ( LOL)
#3 gun control reduces crime... i live in nys alot of both here.
"The/A Holocaust never happened."
I know what you're thinkin' "Theres more than one?" You bet your ass there's more then one.
1) The Armenian Genocide: In World War I The Germans invaded Armenia and completely destroyed every single member of the nation of Armenia. The current peoples of the republic of Armenia are non native they're merely immigrants. There are no more Native Armenians in existence on Earth. Holocaust.
2) The Holocaust: In World War II The Germans under The Third Reich began the systematic slaughter of an estimated 13 million people. They were Jewish, Gipsy, Gay, Environmentalist, Immigrant Workers, People with conditions, people inclined to speak out against The Nazis and Twins. They were either gassed, burned alive, starved to death or tortured to death. It shocked and awed the entire world including the German people and to this date many Germans are unsure they can be proud to be German because of the war crimes of The Third Reich. Holocaust. The Germans have invented a word for people who seek joy and laughter in other people's misfortunes: "Schadenfreut" I'm not sure if that's the correct spelling but the correct pronunciation is SHAH-DEN-FROYT
3)Atomic Holocaust: In World War II the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by the atomic bombs Little Boy and Fat Man. 25,000 people died instantly in the blast at Hiroshima. 100,000 people died instantly in the blast at Nagasaki. 60,000 people died from complications due to radiation poisoning an accumulated total of 185,000 people. Holocaust. That is the namesake for the scenario of Nuclear Holocaust. Nuclear Holocaust is when every living thing on a planet is killed by a series of Atomic Bombs being dropped.
In some parts of the world they actually have laws against denouncing The Holocaust. So if the Republicans want to make an anti flag burning amendment turnabout is fairplay then we must make an anti cross burning amendment and an amendment that makes denouncing any Holocaust a federal offense.
Your Arrogance Will Be Your Undoing
Perfection Is An Illusion And Delusion Of Narcissists And Despots
It's Not Who You Were It's More In Who You Are And Who You Will Be
It's hard to quantify how "dumb" an argument is. Devoid of logic? Everything liberals and religious people say is equally dumb in that respect.
The dumbest thing I've heard is somone who said atheism is 100% true because 2+2 = 5 .........(head explodes)
Because lowering taxes under jfk increased revenue, decreasing taxes will increase revenue, ignoring that we are to the left of the Laffer curve
At 8/17/11 01:51 PM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote: The dumbest thing I've heard is somone who said atheism is 100% true because 2+2 = 5 .........(head explodes)
Holy shit on the back of a hamster. SHAGGY!!
We've missed you so dearly.
We now have a friend to slap around again.
It's not the lack of crimes that values your morality but your capacity for contrition.
At 12/3/10 09:17 PM, LaForge wrote: There is a "God".
Probably already said, didn't read the thread.
That isn't even an argument.
The dumbest political argument is kinda vague, because anything said by Rick Perry or Michelle Bachmann is full of stupidity (and therefore, lulz)
If you mean argument by something that I actually heard in real life, I would have to say this one time when my mom was talking about my brother improving on his life and my brother defended himself by saying nothing he did mattered because she was just living in the past. Everything is going to be in the past eventually (reminds me of "The Lion King") so why do anything? In terms of other stuff, anything by Christopher Hitchens.
At 7/2/10 05:01 PM, Dawnslayer wrote:At 7/2/10 02:48 PM, Scarface wrote:China is communist? I thought it was capitalist-imperialist with a faux-facade republic that claimed to be communist.At 7/2/10 02:43 PM, Ranger2 wrote: Any, "communism would work if!" arguments.Well Communism can work (China), but people would have to give up many, many civil liberties.
couldn't agree with you no more, Chinese goverment claimed what they do for the people was bullshit.