At 8/20/09 03:15 AM, NeverAgain92 wrote: I just watched this documentary on where they bring an American family to another country.
The American family had two daughters who were about 15-16 years old.

When the American family had visited the natives of the other country, there were 16 year old native girls greeting them, who had no top on. Just flashing their boobs about.

So I guess documentaries showing native teenagers of an island with no top on is ok.
But I got to wondering. If the girls from the American family had no top on, the show would be considered illegal.

Does this mean teenagers in America can't flash their boobs anywhere in the world?

In some African countries, it is their culture to not wear a top because they don't consider them sexually attractive. They consider the upper part of there legs that

At 8/20/09 04:19 AM, BFK wrote: it's legal because

OMG IT'S THE KITTYKREW FOUNDER!!!

I guess since its legal there, and the natives not in America, it is legal to show if the purpose is educational and not solely pornographic.

As for the U.S. girls, I'm not sure on the legality of that situation.

That is quite a strange rule.

I think it has something to do with the origin of the person. If the person has been accepted into that culture, then shirts off could be seen on TV no matter what race. But if they are just tourist that are of another culture, then their privates have to be censored.

At 8/20/09 03:23 AM, Chillee wrote:

At 8/20/09 03:20 AM, NeverAgain92 wrote:

At 8/20/09 03:16 AM, 372 wrote: pics? ;D

Sorry if this violates Newgrounds law, but they are natives. lol

Ohhhhh they were black.

Well that's why it's legal. They're not human so it's OK to post their tits on TV.

This has got to be the funniest thing I've ever read on Newgrounds.

At 7/29/11 05:31 PM, mariozplaze wrote:

At 8/20/09 03:15 AM, NeverAgain92 wrote:

Why the 2 year bump and not a massive wall of text?

Holy mother of necromancy, what happened here?

It should be legal for anyone to walk around anywhere naked if they please, I cannot fathom how anyone can disagree or how anyone can be okay with laws that forbid them to do so. In this respect the natives you mentioned in the documentary are socially more advanced that us.

At 8/20/09 04:27 AM, Tribalfusion-X wrote:

At 8/20/09 03:18 AM, Chillee wrote: In Ontario it is legal for women to walk around with no shirt. It's their choice.

What? But men can? Ontario is gay.

Yeah men can too. You're gay.

At 8/20/09 03:22 AM, jwags1 wrote: Titties!!

I bet you've been waiting so long to post that picture.

bring me a 16 year old hot bitch to fuck this instant so I can speculate the information i gather from my experiments to make an accurate post.

At 8/20/09 03:25 AM, Peaceblossom wrote: Actually child pornography laws aren't nearly as bad as you would think. Like, there has to be something sexually provocative for breasts to be considered explicit and pornography. There can also be artistic license in taking nude photos of women who are underage.

Thank you, I thought I was going to have to explain to these plebeians that as long as nudity is displayed in a non-pornographic way, it's perfectly legal.

Case in point, Lolita and American Beauty.

At 7/29/11 07:42 PM, TyPah wrote: CP on TV?! They're barely children, even compared to me, but that's a dream come true.

It's not child porn you dumb retarded monkey fuck.

A 16 year old is not a CHILD, they are classed as YOUNG ADULT.

Are you saying that being 6 is the same as being 16?

I just want to know why you were watching this in the first place.

At 8/20/09 04:19 AM, BFK wrote: it's legal because

speak for yourself g

White American tits are apparently sacred.

At 7/29/11 05:37 PM, FBIpolux wrote: 16 years old is legal in Quebec.

newbs

reppin quebec to the fullest

At 8/20/09 04:19 AM, BFK wrote: it's legal because

He has a big-ass head.

There's a difference between a body part when it's sexualized and when it's not.

Laws are made by losers, for losers, FUCK laws.

At 7/30/11 04:54 AM, Addict wrote: Well they're not depicted sexually so I guess it's legal in this case.

Also education purposes.

also africans =/= people

At 8/20/09 04:27 AM, AndersonCouncil wrote:

At 8/20/09 04:22 AM, UCanCallMeJesus wrote: Where did you come from. I live in the US and I am pretty sure that it is illegal here for a adult to fuck a minor. Thats crazy if I had a child I wouldn't live there.

The legal age to consent for sex is 16 if my memory serves me right.

Yes, but that rule is blatantly ignored.

At 8/20/09 03:18 AM, Chillee wrote: In Ontario it is legal for women to walk around with no shirt. It's their choice.

Where the legal definition comes is are they allowed to walk around with no shirt on, but does it stipulate that they must have a bra on, for example?

At 8/20/09 03:46 AM, Chillee wrote:

At 8/20/09 03:43 AM, UCanCallMeJesus wrote: Under age nudity is fine in any culture as long as it's not sexual. Why you don't see sixteen year old American women naked on tv is because pretty much everyone in America relates being nude to sex.

You're an idiot. Any nudity in most of the states is illegal.

Define nudity - if nudity is exposed flesh, I'd say that anyone walking around with less than a Burkha on is guilty of public nudity.

Hell, I'm showing off my arms, legs, face and neck at the moment.

Ugly people should be forced to wear a burkha, the sexiest people alive should be encourage to run around nude.