Pure Elegance


Date Submitted

09/13/2007 | 04:31PM EDT

File Information

Trance Song | 5.3 MB | 5 min 48 sec

Add Song to Favorites

Current Score

4.39 / 5.00

Score Rank: #1,622
Popularity Rank: #9,260

193 votes

2,670 listens

255 downloads

Click an icon to vote on this!

You are not logged in.

If you log in to vote, you could win $100!

Related Submissions

Submissions by Qwertyuiopasd:

Licensing Terms

Commons Deed | Legal Code | ?

Download this song!

Attribution: You must give credit to the artist.

Noncommercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless you make specific arrangements with the artist under another license.

Share Alike: If you alter, transform, or build upon this music, you may distribute the resulting creation only under a license identical to this one.

Author Comments

A classical fusiony piece I'm proud of. Kudos to Hyper-Freak92 for the awesome snarework

11 reviews | Log in to write a review | Share this!

The people have spoken

Average Score: 8.8 / 10

Score: 10
Anima-Theory

"Lets play the pro's and cons games...."

date: March 13, 2008

Ok, lets play the pro's and cons games

First Cons, they tend to be easier :P

Cons:
-The piano, I think, should have more reverb on it and have less midrange freqs.
-The snare roll should have a bit more bass and mid on it.
-The bass line has a lot to be desired for as well...lack of complexity.
-It does get a little bit repetitive, ONLY A LITTLE THOUGH.
-There isn't much percussion either.
-For a trance song the over bass isn't loud.

Pros:
-The piano has a fucking great tune.
-The bells work very nicely.
-The stringed instruments work very well and sound very professional.
-The snare rolls that you put in fit very well and add a lot of ambiance to the song.

There ARE more cons the pros, but whenever I write a review, there always are. Seriously though, very nice song, it is indeed your best, and I would be proud to submit this song. Very well done, you are a magnificent artist with a lot of potential and talent. Regardless of the above pros and cons, you do deserve a 10/10 and 5/5.

Hope to hear more soon

PM me when you submit again

Your mate

Anima

March 14, 2008

Author's Response:

Thanks for the levelling/mastering suggestions. I don't really know much about mastering in FL, but I usually don't have too much problem avoiding it. unless I'm doing it without realizing it...

the newer version will have many more "takes" on the main riff, so even if they're not all completely different, I've learned that just the slightest bit of change can make something less monotonous

I hate the way I can't fit myself into one genre, because this really is more of a fusion piece. Classical instrumentation, but more electronic assembly and arrangement.

Thanks for the review, of course. :D

~Qwerty

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 7
CezarLaser

"Not baaaaaad"

date: February 10, 2008

It's okay - drumjs could have been stronger but I suppose that's just my taste and opinion.

March 14, 2008

Author's Response:

Yeah, as I think about it, a better kick could add a good ammount of character to it.

But of course, it's not the focus, so I'm not sure I'll be able to please you entirely. you might like Living Nightmare, by me, though. it has percusiion >:D

bwa ha ha.

Thanks for the review!

~Qwerty

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 9
vanillacat

"iiinteresting"

date: February 1, 2008

Probably my favorite piece by you. The classical insert makes it stand out - it's a little repetitive though. I didn't notice when the song looped - I don't know if that's a good thing or not. :/ However, overall, a good piece.

February 3, 2008

Author's Response:

Yeah, I plan to re-work this song so it's less repetitive, but still basically working off the arpegiations. just... different arps.

thanks for the review.

~Qwerty

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
piano-man1

"great song!"

date: January 24, 2008

I like this. like, a lot.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 9
ikiama

"sweet~!"

by: ikiama
date: December 31, 2007

its so relaxing i may fall asleep!

January 9, 2008

Author's Response:

at least you had time to review :D

I'm going to make an improved version in a few months, so look for that to be slightly more varied. it'll either keep you awake more... or be more HyPnOtIzInG.

. . .

yeah.

Thanks for the review.

~Qwerty

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.