00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Ryor just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Reviews for "Deathmatch"

Noisysundae - Deathmatch:

The Good:
-Your thematic placement is very good - it repeats in very nice ways throughout. I like the placement of the initial theme in the background of the melodies.
-The arpeggios are very well-done, and there are in general a lot of really neat sound effects throughout this.
-Really nice submerged lowpass sound at 1:10!
-This piece has some seriously solid mixing overall, which is very nice! Good tight bass, solid high end. I might try to bring out the high melody a little bit more, but not too much else.

The Not-So-Good:
-There's barely any variation throughout this piece, unfortunately - not in terms of melody, but in terms of mood. There is the intro, and then there is the high-octane, really fast DnB middle, and then the outro (minus the 10-second breakdown). The problem is that the middle is basically the whole piece. If you listen to a lot of popular/highly rated works, they tend to have some difference in mood between the different sections so that people aren't bored (in slower pieces) or kept at high tension for too long (in this piece and similar).
-Your transitions could actually use some work - primarily between your light intro/outro and the midsection.
-Throughout 1:10 to around 2:10, the melodies seem fairly aimless (with one caveat of 1:40 and 1:55 referencing the main theme). I think that the soloing/melodic development in this could be improved significantly.
-Now, I'm pretty sure the intro and outro are almost exactly the same.

The Result: 7.6/10
Your piece has a really well-developed melody, but suffers from a few important missteps - some aimless melodies, several subpar transitions in important places, and mainly the lack of mood variation. That said, there's a really good foundation here - that's how you got this far, after all! You can do it!

Noisysundae responds:

This tells me that I need to spend more time on a track to develop better composition and arrangement. One of my problems is I got into the contest while I'm not inspired. Not an excuse for not making a better piece, though. Thanks a bunch for the tips. Definitely helpful for my future sundaes! :)

This is an official NGAUC Review

My personal rating for your piece is as follows:
Production: 27/30 (Great)
Composition: 24/30 (Above Average)
Instrumentation: 12/15 (Above Average)
Originality: 9/10 (Great)
Interest: 11/15 (Above Average)

Giving a total of 83/100, or 4 stars. (Above Average)

Please view your rubric for comments-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/ngauc2016samulis/Finals/Noisysundae.png

Noisysundae responds:

Woah, the rubric was very clear and I can understand how my piece goes even before I read the comments. A lot of thanks for this!

I'm still trying to achieve the ability to make that 'hummable, singable melody' type of writing. (Sorry for the imitation here, I can't think of another word for it. :P) Perhaps my writer's block isn't really broken since this track needs more variation. Guess it's time to learn more about music theory.

I like the dreamy and soothing intro. The slow wind-down and brief riser before the refrain at :34 was a creative idea that channeled the energy well. During the refrain, I wish you had brought out the piano melodies more than the arpeggios. It just seemed a little hard to get a grip on the melodic content as a listener there. The breakdown at 1:06 brings some very welcome structural variety. I like the danceable synth patterns at 1:22 a lot. The texture is full and engaging throughout, and the mastering quality is superb. The stop-start transition at 2:10 was well-orchestrated, even if it seemed uncharacteristic of what is otherwise a very flowy piece. Nice job bringing it full-circle with the smooth piano at 2:46. The fade-out itself seemed a bit lazily done, though. I also wished you had varied the melodies more during the 2nd refrain, especially since the harmonies are pretty uniform throughout the piece (the arpeggios are a near-constant presence in the mix, even during the breakdown section). The instruments blend well and help enhance the mood, even if they’re not entirely unique. Overall, this is a very enjoyable piece with a few minor details that could use improvement. Nice work, Noisysundae! ;)

8.5/10

Noisysundae responds:

Didn't expect the judges to like the breakdown that much. XD

I actually toned down the piano during the climax since it obstructs the arp which lacks mid and low. Should have done the panning on the arp instead, I guess. :/

This one was done just several hours before the deadline so indeed, the ending was lazily done. If only I got the idea of 3/4 DnB earlier...

Anyway, one thing I'm happy about making it quick is how it points out my weaknesses on music production more than when I have more time. Thanks for the review as usual, TL. Hope we'll meet again at the NGUAC '17! :D

i love you

Noisysundae responds:

But I hate ya.
Jk. ;P

Nice job. This piano is nice!
I don't have much to say, except what Infinity and Ember said. NEVER use Unison basses, they usually don't fit in your mix well. Basses sound way better in Mono.
Good luck in the Contest mate. You deserve a win! :D

Noisysundae responds:

Win what place? The last one? D:

Actually, using unison on the bass works sometimes, particularly when it's layered with another bass. Many faster pieces with house beats (hard trance, happycore, etc.) have it. However, it doesn't mean it does the job here.