Well, more a lucky game but nic idea now put the game also that isnt just waiting the luck and that weactualy are a person in a random scenario. 3 stars
Reviews for "Sim Apocalypse"
It's a good concept, but it's realy unbalanced. It's impossible to survive because you will basicly always starve. Your companions will eat all food and leave you with nothing upon wich you slowly starve to death because you can only regen 2 health between every meal, and you lose 5 health. You can't eat your companions, you can't make your companions starve instead of you, and you can't abondon companions. So yeah even though i had 1000+ weapons and 90 survivability, i starved to death after 30 days because i had 40 companions.
This game should have a lot more depth to it than it does.
Here are some recommendations:
-Randomly give players a choice every once in a while that will affect the game.
-Make more events than just 'companion leaves' or 'is attacked'. Perhaps some good events could occur, as well as more bad ones like food spoiling.
-Bunkers should allow you to survive Nuclear attack.
Even though I am giving it three stars I feel oddly compelled to play the game. The whole thing just feels rough around the edges and I do think that having more interactivity would improve the game play. I would like it if the survivability skill more clearly showed how well you are protected from attacks.
Plus I managed to survive over 150 days but I only got the medal for 150 days but I was not awarded the 50 day or 100 day medals.
Good game, really easy unless your going for the medals. Max time i lasted was 15 days. Either my health ran out when i had a lot of food and weapons, or i ran out of food because i ended up finding 10+ companions and they ate all my food. If there was a way to get rid of companions that would have been cool. Or at least starve off those piggys and have them die first XD.