Everyone has their bias.
The guy who wrote this is an atheist. Something to keep in mind.
I suppose this is supposed to be an overly caustic form of satire. As such, I suppose it has achieved its purpose. Although I must say that the huge chip on the author's shoulder becomes very evident. Which is all good and well, but from an artistic perspective, such an intense agenda actually detracts from the value of the satirical commentary. Lighten up, man.
But "SvenSvan," seriously now....
Quote (just a few reviews down):
so, yes God killed everyone, except for the riteous Noah, you got that right...but nothing in the Bible says about them going to hell. Any riteous people who dies in the flood would have gone to heaven...acctually they wouldnt have gone to either because most of them are jews and they dont believe that people are judged after death until the second comming of Christ. Also, you mention Jesus in your flash, but the story of Noahs arc takes place hundreds of years before the birth of Christ...do some effing research if you wanna make fun of an institution of over 2000 years of age. Also, not only Christians have a story about a great flood, the ancient Greeks and Sumerians also had similar stories.
Alright dude, couple small problems here. I'm on your side, but you're just getting it all way too wrong.
Nothing in the Bible says they were all sent to hell... unless you consider that the Bible specifically says—repeatedly, in fact—that every single one of them was evil, and that every thought and motive they ever had was evil, with the sole exception of Noah and his family. Oh, and that also takes care of your "Any righteous people who dies in the flood would have gone to heaven" thing, because not a single righteous person died in the flood. They were all evil. All of them.
Then your very next bit about them being Jews and therefore not going immediately to Heaven or to hell... no. Jews didn't even exist until Abraham. Abraham is a descendant of Noah. Furthermore, the Bible says that people had populated the whole earth... by implication, it's not hard to imagine that there might already have arisen many kingdoms, nations, etc. by this time. And lastly, where a person goes is not determined by what they believe; it's determined by the reality of things, whether or not they believe in that reality.
About Jesus. Actually, he's right on to mention Jesus. Ever read the book of John? It's in the New Testament, after Matthew, Mark, and Luke. It starts like this: "In the beginning was the Word; and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. All things were created through Him, and apart from Him not one thing was created that has been created." The Word, my friend, was Jesus. Jesus, being one with God and God himself, has always existed, just as God has always existed. The Bible says that all of creation happened through Him. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that if your conception of Jesus is of a man that lived on earth, if you think of Jesus's existence as spanning about 33 years, if you think that Jesus came into existence when he was humanly born of Mary about 2000 years ago, then you have an incredibly small Jesus, and a very small God.
You're right that there are other accounts of a great, worldwide flood. Someone else has mentioned, accurately, that there is geological evidence for it. But gosh, man, have you ever actually read your own Bible? Or did you just accept what your Pastor or Sunday School teacher taught you when you were a kid? Did you ever actually think about it at all? I mean, anyone who's even cracked their own Bible a few times understands that Jesus has always been, and that creation, and pretty much everything else throughout all of time, happened through Him.
So to turn it back on you.... do some effing research before you make the rest of us Christians look like ignorant buffoons.