I wont.
If you never mention this again.
I wont.
If you never mention this again.
???
i agree with sangerZonvolt but know its 2nd place what the hell!!!???
I'm as confused as you are. but hey. I don't make those decisions. you people do.
oooooooooooooo.kkkkkkkkkkkkkk.
it's funny for a few seconds but then...
i would say : ist not the best but not the worst
I thought it was going to be better...
I immideatly saw this and clicked to watch, but i was dissapointed to find all those flaws.
It was incredably short, and didnt have much point, it was a 30 second film with no plot whatsoever.
Another problem was the voices, you did a really good job of sounding like Family Guy, but when you did Peter, you shouldnt have done him shouting out, but did him laughing "Hehehehehehehehehehe"beacause that sounds more like a sheep, as well as it being funny, also, Quagmire should have been a woodpecker, i have no idea why he would be a koala, hes nothing like one, A woodpecker would sound like "Giggity Giggity Giggity", and speaking of him saying Giggity, you had him talking half-way through Giggity and then groaning.
Overall it needs a lot of things to work on. I give it three stars for good animation, Sounding like family guy and the Mr. Pewtershmitt sketch was pretty good.
quagmire wasn't a woodpecker.
How did this make it in the daily top 3?
So the animation was... well.. aceptable. There wasn´t much voiceacting so I can´t judge that. What I can judge is the humor: There wasn´t any. A waste of good time if you ask me. With these animation and drawingabilities you could have done better.
30 seconds of your time... wasted? oh my god, i'm so sorry... if there was any way I could repay you... gotta say though, a 4 is a pretty good score for a waste of time, thanks!