short but nice
It was way too short, but definitely nice. Can you imagine how long it must have taken them to make these kind of movies back then?
short but nice
It was way too short, but definitely nice. Can you imagine how long it must have taken them to make these kind of movies back then?
Quite a while! He used several techniques, but offcourse, none of them were digital...
His new movie will be a little more digital but amazing looking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXv9Kg b59xM
Short
While a fine attempt to mimic the work of the Great Gilliam, it was too short to be a fitting tribute. Also, as random as Gilliam's work was, he always fitted some form of a story in there.
That's true, thank you for your comment. And I could never fully mimic his work. This is just an ode.