greed
hey im not greedy or am I
greed
hey im not greedy or am I
lol thats up 2 you =3 thanks for playing
Wrath
Describes me then.
I noticed several typos in this one, unusual for you.
Also, thanks for doing my idea lol, but I think your other quizes had better questions
If im brutally honest, the pictures at the end where naff...
Still, i like it for some reason. it's simple, clever and describes characters well (or so I hear...)
Add a reset button.
lol i'm realy bad at spelling thats why theres prob some typos, and i know but its had to think of lots of differn't questions that can relate to the subject
also the pictures are taken off a site and i like them i think there funny thats why i added them =3
I got wrath
Which is about rightseing as when I'm mad at someone I either punch them or think about punching or hurting them in some way. Good Job on the quiz!!!
lol thanks for your review =3
To the author
Very interesting concept,though you got 1 wrong,pride can be depicted not only as a sin,but as a virtue,for example in budhism it doesn't have any sense,due to their believes that no one is special,where Aristotel says:
Aristotle identified pride (megalopsuchia, variously translated as proper pride, greatness of soul and magnanimity) as the crown of the virtues, distinguishing it from vanity, temperance, and humility, thus:
Now the man is thought to be proud who thinks himself worthy of great things, being worthy of them; for he who does so beyond his deserts is a fool, but no virtuous man is foolish or silly. The proud man, then, is the man we have described. For he who is worthy of little and thinks himself worthy of little is temperate, but not proud; for pride implies greatness, as beauty implies a goodsized body, and little people may be neat and well-proportioned but cannot be beautiful.
He concludes then that
Pride, then, seems to be a sort of crown of the virtues; for it makes them greater, and it is not found without them. Therefore it is hard to be truly proud; for it is impossible without nobility and goodness of character. [9][10]
By contrast, Aristotle defined hubris as follows:
to cause shame to the victim, not in order that anything may happen to you, nor because anything has happened to you, but merely for your own gratification. Hubris is not the requital of past injuries; this is revenge. As for the pleasure in hubris, its cause is this: men think that by ill-treating others they make their own superiority the greater.[11]
Thus, although many religions may not recognize the difference, for Aristotle and many philosophers hubris is altogether an entirely different thing from pride.
Nietzsche
Nietzsche saw pride as an example of a previous, master set of morals that had been replaced with slave moralities. In this, pride was good, because it acknowledges the good and the noble, rejecting the weak and insipid. Without pride, Nietzsche argued, we will remain subservient
Source: en.wikipedia.org
It's just for info,but overall a very good flash ^^
thanks for your detailed review but i was going of the classic 7 sins since its what most people refer to when they see the sins but i know what you are saying =3
*Hit the passing button*
It's okay.
lol thanks for your review =3