00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Static73 just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Reviews for "4 pointless games in 1"

Good try

while this isnt amozing, it shows you will be able to make something decent in the future, try to think of somthing origional to combine all you ahve learnt ;) good luck.

ok?

wow very pointless. ummm it was a little time waster i guess. i liked it it was pretty fun if you got nothing to do. good i guess.

Koolish....

I liked the ball physics that was pretty cool, i could sit there all day with that....seriously. Other games were fun but needed a bit of sound it felt really strange to not have it. Keep going some good stuff.

meh.

it was ok but....
the quick click eh no point.
the ball physics, no point.....
the jet pack hamster....no point......is this reveiw getting repetitive?
the maze was just a bit fun but when i reached the end....nothing.
my advice to improve your game is give rewards! at least make it so that when you complete something or get a really good score on the click game you get a WIN screen it gives meaning to the game and encourages the playerr...? i dunno but yea or you could put acheivements in the first screen for doing something like "get 100 feet up on the balll game" or get to 500 clicks in the cloick game . i dunno bout the hamster.....had no point in it and the maze game you could work on making the dead ends not so obvious. hope you improve! (also look at your song choice not everyone likes country)

Wow, but ... wha-

One of three things came to mind:

1. You have a PhD in psychology and this somehow relates to your thesis on memetic decline in gaming communities.
2. You are a pretty decent programmer with natural talent, who made and submitted this game after a night of heavy mushroom eating and masterbation. Thus, being spent, you couldn't produce anything with a modicum of imagination (we've all been there ...)
3. You are a crappy programmer that just decided to contribute something on the spur of the moment spending every waking second on this little piece. After working so hard, who wouldn't want to share? I can also understand that.

This review is assuming the type 3 scenario. In such a case I give you 6 out of ten. I would also tell you, if number 3 is true that you should continue with programming and maybe try to improve on everything (from sound to art) and maybe try to combine this physics heavy theme you got going into something with a begining, middle and end.

If scenario 2 is true, then I sincerely look forward to viewing some of your other work.

If scenario 1 is true then: fuck you dude, it's not nice to mess with people!