I enjoyed it
It was original but i think that maybe you could have added the option to be harsh and continue.
Either way it was good, 4/5 7/10
Haruk0
Reviews for "NG Review Game #1"
Little-Rena responds:
I could have and wanted to but, I didn't know how to work that in :S
eat stuff
Started. Got them all correct. On the 2nd last flash, I decided to test some other options out. Messed around with it. Finished.
++++ Love the idea. It's a good way to try and teach folk. The format and the mechanics are all great.
++++ Great edit of the NG bg. Specially like the details - tankmen13.5. heh.
+++ Great presentation generally (in the NG bit anyway).
-- I'm not entirely sure I agree with your examples. Mainly because some of the things were so innappropriate to the subject matter. Telling someone to add bg/bgm to that lousy thing would be bad advice. Better advice may be to advise them to actually think about maybe having a story/joke/something of entertainment value. And generally have characters that look more like living things.
And the last one - 'some of the effects need work'? C'mon. 'some'? How about, 'Kinda funny message but the graphics need more work.'
-- Having [bla bla] is kinda lame. I think you should've had an example of a good but short review actually written out.
--- The tunes were way too long. Whilst writing this review, I listened to all the tune for after we get one correct and thought, 'no-one'd normally hear all that'. Same with the cheese tune. Pointless waste of file space. Set it to stream mebbe, with a few frames for it to play on, and it'll cut out afterwards itself and not compile the rest of the tune.
--- I don't think you should have the whistler for the positive but stupid reviews. Some of those would never be whistled. Instead, maybe suggest we add some crit. to make the flasher learn or whatever.
--- don't make your site open in the same window. Set target to '_blank' and it'll open in a new one.
- The drawn gfx - mainly the big happy face - could use a bit of work. Maybe cleaning up and also some shading.
==
Great stuff.
I'd love to see this redone with a few changes. It could be yet more enjoyable and effective than it is just now.
You mention below that you're looking to make a fuller version. If you need any help or if you'd like any feedback or anything before submission, let me know.
Stay funky and keep up the great work!
Looking forward to seeing this taken to the next level.
Little-Rena responds:
Yeah, I think I'll change the way the reviews go next time.
And for the flashs, I have some people who are ready to help to compensate for my lack of drawing skills.
For the website, I thought it did open in a new window but nevermind.
I'll remember to set it stream next time.
Thanks for the review.
Morale
I can see the fact your trying to get the point across about reviews and such, that effort and time helps make a fairly well review, though I do suggest a little more effort. I'm gonna see what the second one is like, and see if it has a little more quality and time added into it. I did enjoy this though. It was very fun.
Little-Rena responds:
Yeah, this was more a test :p
funny
I like it, it's subtly humorous, however, i would say that if people didn't submit crap flash, that is abusive to my senses, then i wouln't have to make abusive reviews.
Little-Rena responds:
Abusive reviews are always bad, not only for the author but for yourself.
Take any TotW for example.
If you gave it an abusive review, you gould risk getting a review ban.
Why take that chance?
But thanks for the input :)
wasn't as good as the second one
only four reviews isn't good enough.
it was good though.
just not enough.
I'm looking forward to more games like this.
Little-Rena responds:
Well, this was just somthing I made on my own, the second was with a group of people helping which is what made it better than this.