UM . . .
I'm sorry but this knee jerk reaction to 9/11 is as stupid as as the anti-war movement itself. No, violence against Arabs was seen in the US, outside of a few idiots and we as Americans held them accountable to the law. By comparison, FDR rounded up Japanese Americans simply for their ancestry. GW did no such thing, and has gone out of his way to let the public know he does not hold Muslims accountable for the acts of terrorists.
However, the idea that going to war over an act of war as "revenge," is no more revenge than going to war over Pearl Harbor. How many times has Japan attacked us since then? There are justfiable causes for war, and to ignore them is just as evil as terrorism itself.
George Orwell had it right:
"Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me.'""
"Since pacifists have more freedom of action in countries where traces of democracy survive, pacifism can act more effectively against democracy than for it. Objectively the pacifist is pro-Nazi."
Put the present enemy in, and the quotes are just as relevant today as they were in Orwell's time. The pacifist is pro-terrorist.