00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

BanoyAlbert just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Reviews for "BlondStar"

Yawn.

So this is front page material, huh?

I guess it is semi-original and different in style, but it's really not anything new (try seaching Google video or Alta Vista video for "blondestar" for the original video of this). However, I have a hard time understanding why it's on the front page.

Technically and artistically, this piece is VERY lacking. It fades unstyled text and a logo every so often. I expected a lot more.

It is fairly humorous, but mostly because of the audio, not the text. The text just didn't add enough to support.

I honestly think this gets put onto the front page for political reasons. ZipperFish movies pretty much ALWAYS get on the front page. Why is that? Do they refer enough links to get special treatment? This certainly does not deserve it in my opinion.

Sry man

Not worth the Vote that it has but that's not what bothers me...
its BlondEstar not blondtar. hehe

Here's a Funny Idea

Imagine "Black Star": an On-Star spinoff for the intellectually-challenged African-American population. Oh wait a minute, that type of racism isn't PC. But apparently it's okay to make negative judgements about people of Nordic descent...

The funny thing is that states with a large concentration of blonde-haired people (Scandinavia, Germany, etc) are the most highly civilized and prosperous places on Earth. Proving that blondes are probably better than most--if not all--ethnic brunette groups.

There is not much to say about the movie other than its offensive themes because it is just a bunch of text titles fading in and out (although they were synchronized nicely with the stolen audio file).

Meh

The main problem here is not that you used uncredited audio from elsewhere, but that what you actually did do not only was little, but actually took away from the whole thing.

Some of the text you added like the acronyms were pointless and really took me out of it. If you wanted a good rating you should have done *something* besides adding bland text.

The audio was pretty funny, but as you had nothing to do with its creation I just gave an overall score based upon your work, and I wasn't too into it.

Additionally, HOW IN GODS NAME DID THIS MAKE THE FRONT PAGE?

Poor

Since I have to rate on the work contributed to this... it's pretty low. the audio is funny and all but what was the point of submitting this with a silly text monologue to go with it? Even if you'd made an animation to go along with this it would already be 1000 times better than this, no matter how crudely drawn and animated. I've seen your other work, and you are a lot better than this. Disapointing.