good try but....
I have to agree, you need a good bit of work, sorry.. try again, make something new, all flash artists have to start somewhere!
Reviews for "Halo Preview"
Jepette responds:
I love your review, this one is helpful.
Halo Trailer
This.. is pitiful, no offense.
(Though I can't make flash movies)
GOD, THAT WAS SO UNREALISTIC
IF THAT WAS ON HALO 2
THAT WAS PITIFUL
Because the story line was much, much different.
1: That "Extraterrestrial" force was not unknown; It was the Coveannt forces.
2: What kind of Pelican was that? O.o It says Pelican on the damn front. It's supposed to say "Marines." And, it was in New York? Jesus, new perspective.
3: The Master Chief walked so.. slow. And the marines dropping down was.. unrealistic. Stupid.
4: Walmart trucks and that crap? Like the last viewer; It did look like a elephant, the Grunt being killed.
If you're going to post Halo 2 Reviews,
MAKE IT GOOD.
(Note: The sounds were good, but it was from Halo 2.)
Er... it was interesting...
Let's do a rundown on this-
Graphics- Honestly, the graphics were pretty bad. I've seen grade schoolers draw better humanoids. I can understand that it's slightly harder to draw on a mouse, but still.. there's nor eason for the graphics to stink that bad. I gave it a 2 because I still could actually understand what was happening.
Sound- 4. Good sound, except for the part where the only good sounds were ripped right from the Halo 2 Trailer. The bombing of New York was repetative sounds that barely sounded like bombs. It sounded more like someone tape recorded some fireworks.
Style- There is no developed style or technique. Nor is there a story or any hint of diversity from other normal ideas. You're setting yourself up for a huge blast by using the name Halo. If something says Halo, it either rocks on Newsgrounds or Sucks. Now, I'd have to call this one a suck. 0.
Violence- 2. Some grunt who loked like a badly drawn yellow elephant got shot.
Humor- What Humor? Even Halo, the story of a war, has humor. 0.
Interactivity- There's a button that says Play, and (god-forbid) Replay. 1.
Overall- First off, it doesn't follow the plot of halo, so what's it doing with the name. Third of all, do you even understand what "Reinforcements are on the spoke" means? It seems like it was just thrown in there to remind people that it was Halo. Honestly, I can't actually bring myself to comprehend that soemthing this bad still can use the name of Halo and not be destroyed by the holy sweet FPS powers of that name.
Keep trying?
Well, I have to agree with the other reviewers - this does suck. Still, My 2nd submission (I spent 2 weeks on it) was pretty bad, so I can understand that it takes time to get good...
Maybe in using the halo name you were setting yourself up for a fall? After all, many consider it the greatest fps ever and you obviously haven't done it justice.
The graphics are poor, as is the animation. The last nail in the coffin is the fact that there's no story here or any interesting action.
It's hard to make interesting previews or trailers... The movie will obviously be better, but I suggest that in future you maybe think a bit more about the action/story and maybe you could make something enjoyable to watch?
Keep trying,
Bez
Jepette responds:
Yeah you're right and all the other too. I had hope that it is popular but not. My English is bad because I
am French. I would not make a film of then!
Dude you are a discrase to Halo.
Dude fucking no just fucking no.