not good
there was no team work to guys would shoot one then each other wat the hell?And most of the time there was only one on one on the screen not ten on ten with back up on the way,thats nothin like on a battlefield!>:(
Reviews for "The Battlefield III"
Ringfinger responds:
and ???? so?......stupid n00b...
.....
Excellent Violence, excellent sound, excellent grahics, but no point! There should really be a story!
not NEARLY as good as it could be
like it was pretty good at first but then it was just mindless destruction with them shooting off chunks of the set with grenade launchers
very repetitive
if i wanted to see sticks killing each other than i would play xiao xiao. if there were easy to distinguish teams then itd be better but no. just a bunch of stick beatin the crpa outta each other. weaponmaster is better than this because a:its not so long b: theres good music c: who is who is distinguishable d:its faster pacewise. work on it some.
i hate u
first of all Dim of the super-flash-bros wrote a review for this and you didn't respond!how could you?!
and second this is a total rip off of unglued by blue2.its the same but pointless,without music,bad graphics,and it was just a stupid rip off. u suck bawls.
:(