Workable idea, poor execution
I really like how you protect yourself against bad reviews by claiming the "jokes" flew over the heads of the reviewers. That's a really nice way to put down critisism. Good going guys.
This is a good idea. I can see how this could've been really funny. Unfortunaly it wasn't. I seldom laugh at the concept of troll physics though, so I don't blame this on you. I'll try to avoid this subject in this review.
Watching all of these in a row was a difficult task. You should've helped eachother to get a higer quality in every clip. For example the troll face, that was kind of a running theme, seemed like it had a different quality in almost every clip. The graphics was unevenly balanced, involving everything from pure tweening to fbf mixed up with texture graphics. Though, I cant blame you on that point because, as you said, it was meant to have low quailty overall. Personally I don't think working towards low quality is a good idea ever. I experience it as lazyness. I would've enjoyed this collab more if it had a higher level of graphics.
Timing was also a hard thing to grasp. Every movie had its own flow, and music. Everything from slow (and over-used) songs, to hard up-beat things with a lot of bass. This mixed in with many moments of silence. Even though all movies used roughly the same number of steps to explain its troll physics, some was much longer than others.
If you want a good collab you should've keep an ongoing steady pace. This is the job of the collab organizer. I've been part of collabs thats been very undetermined on that point, and it really brings down the result overall.
Its not good to defend yourself against this kind of critisism. You've been working with this since october, as you point out. Its not something to be proud of.
Oh, and if you want, you can rant at me for not being 100% awesome at the english language btw, I don't mind, and I see that you enjoy that kind of behavior.