I will first complement this movie on one point. The movie did not feature a long, slow, painful torture. I disapprove of that because I know the mentality of doing it. A great deal of pain is unleashed and the people who are watching it are supposed to get satisfaction, joy, and humor through watching a person slowly suffer. That seems almost as immoral as wanting to pilot a plane full of innocent people into a building. I'm sorry, but it seems honestly very sick and the actions of someone who needs a lot of time to calm down from being so hateful. So I complement this movie on not having it. But beyond that, there were a few things. I first came to the movie thinking that this could be a nicer anti-bin Laden film, being a parody of AYB. But I started getting upset from the start. The title was, once again, implying that there is a war going on. A war on what? You can't declare war on a single person or organization. You can only declare them criminals. And if it refers to the War on Terrorism, then that seems ridiculous and potentially disastrous. It's unrealistic to think that a person could get rid of all terrorism in the world. There are terrorists against the US in THIS country, for crying out loud. Even if you could, though I hate to think of how many people you would kill along the way as collateral or how many civil liberties you would have to violate, you can't get rid of it forever. There will always be evil in the hearts of men, and they'll always be disagreements with what happens in government. And among those disagreements will be more extreme and fanatical people who would resort to terrorism. But beyond that, the film had, once again, a killing of bin Laden. The movie once again seemed geared toward causing pleasure through the death of another, which is something that I think is wrong as well. To cry out in cheer at someone's demise seems immoral in and of itself, regardless of who it is. And when that much emotion, hate, and passion is involved, how can we say justice has been done? But what more, I think killing in itself is also wrong. It's not right for a terrorist to kill many innocent people, and likewise it's not right to use death as a punishment. Either way, there is a degree of sacredness of life that I believe gives no human the right to kill another. Therefore, if there's any way that we could capture and incarcerate bin Laden without killing him, I think we should do it. Beyond moral wrongness, there's also the idea that in the process of getting him we may end up worse off. If he moves to other countries, and keeps doing so, we'll risk pissing off even more potential terrorists if we try to raze the entire Middle East, and leave behind injuries that more people will hold against us. Then there's the whole possibility that fanatics may see him as a "martyr"... At any rate, I think that the killing is wrong and won't be effective, nor will it bring the people back who were killed. I thank you again for not having a gruesome torture.

it was straight butit was funny

I dont know what the fuck that was, but I laughed... so you get an 8... ;)

This is good. The sound is no different from the original AYB movie which is why you got such a low mark for sound but style was high because it was an anti Osama movie, violence was nothing for obvious reasons. Ditto that for interactivity, and of course graphics only got a five because Bushs head doesn't go well on Cats body and Osama's head is too big.

And for those who havn't already done so, download ZERO WING for Sega Genisis off any good Rom websites because it is quite a good game!

THIS IS VERY COOL. NOT ENOUGH OSAMA BLOOD FOR 10.