At 1/6/08 09:07 PM, XxTheWorldIsYoursxX wrote:

At 1/6/08 08:07 PM, hammerhead84 wrote:

The guy's name is SirStanley and holy fuck, he is a pedophile.

Holy fuck is right. This guy's got a few screws loose.

Amen, just look around his userpage and look at the movies. You'll see some stuff.

At 1/6/08 08:07 PM, hammerhead84 wrote: So I was browsing today and I found guy's userpage. The guy's name is SirStanley and holy fuck, he is a pedophile. Look at the userpage, he's obsessed with Molly Walker (Adair Tishler) from Heroes.

Dude, stop trying to ruin Newgrounds for me. You also sent me a nasty PM over this. I want the Newgrounds community to take my work seriously, and this is not helping.

The wierdest part is she is ELEVEN YEARS OLD.

Is it so wrong to find her attractive? Personally, I don't see why everyone else isn't finding her attractive. She's extremely pretty.

I think other people do, but that they will not admit it for some reason.

I'm sorry, it's just fucking creepy, the guy is 24, and literally wants to bang this girl.

Hey, I never said I wanted to do that. I find it says more about YOU, that when I say I am attracted to someone, you immediately bring that up. Some people have a one-track mind, and I guess it's obvious which kind you have.

Even wierder, there is apparently a Crew devoted to her with more flash submissions that say that she is "hot". I almost threw up in my own liver when I saw this one. Eeeeww.

The crew is under construction right now, which is why I haven't announced it anywhere. I'm hoping to find some people here who are also fans of her that will submit some quality flash movies. But, it's not going to be limited to just flash makers.

At 1/6/08 08:11 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: Lets make a thread and say hes a pedophile.

Exactly. I don't see what the big deal is either. People need to take a chill pill.

At 1/6/08 08:09 PM, saqwert wrote: Im gonna join his crew

At 1/6/08 08:12 PM, DepressedStone wrote: I'm gonna join his crew.

Are these requests serious? If so, please PM AdairTishlerCrew.

At 1/6/08 08:08 PM, Straight-Edge wrote: About 99.09% of newgrounders are pedophiles.

how can this be true when 70% of newgrounds is pedophile target material?

At 1/6/08 08:08 PM, Straight-Edge wrote: About 99.09% of newgrounders are pedophiles.

I'm not I don't give a shit how hot a girl is. If she's not over 18 I don't even fuckin look at her after she says it. Fuck that lol. Plus I told wade to quit hitting on the little girls and to leave the site lol. But we still all love him lol. Much love for ya wade

At 1/6/08 08:08 PM, Straight-Edge wrote: About 99.09% of newgrounders are pedophiles.

And I've been looking on Google for someone to touch me.

Wrong,just wrong

At 1/6/08 08:35 PM, SaltshakerClock wrote: and where does this guy live? i just want to make sure that i don't have to walk around with a knife to protect kids at a park.

He used to live in Portland, then he moved to L.A. I assume he's still there.

She is hawt! I want to bang her pussy so rough that sangra consumes her entire body.

This is why we can't have nice things, shit like that makes the rest of look like normal people.

At 1/6/08 08:26 PM, PowerRangerYELLOW wrote:

At 1/6/08 08:20 PM, LadyGrace wrote: People who dedicate to stuff aren't pedos, considering the majority of them are eleven years old, themselves.

thats true but say an 8 year old had concenting sex with another kid close to there own age.

the oldest kid still can get tried as a pedophile in court.

Wrong. They wouldnt be charged at that age in most situations.

And they wouldnt be charged as a pedophile.

It would be statutory rape.

Seriously, if I was a 30 year old fat fuck, I'd want to bang that girl too.

At 1/6/08 08:08 PM, Straight-Edge wrote: About 99.09% of newgrounders are pedophiles.

About 89.09% of newgrounds is under 18... so do you fail yet? 10% is below average for the interwebz

At 1/6/08 08:47 PM, hammerhead84 wrote: Lol read his Review Responses.

Pedophile to the max(imus).

Yeah, this dude has something wrong upstairs.

I'd like to announce, that THIS man is a pedophile. NO EXCEPTIONS.

At 1/6/08 11:38 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote:

At 1/6/08 09:52 PM, SirStanley wrote: I think other people do, but that they will not admit it for some reason.

That tohught it illogical.

No it isn't. People in my reviews are saying stuff like "it would be ok if you were 13", which just means "if you were 13, admitting she was attractive would be alright, but since you're older, you're supposed to pretend she's not even when she is."

Hey, I never said I wanted to do that.

Didn't you say she was "hot", not "a pretty girl"? Regardless, my thoughts on peadophillia are well documented.

I use hot and pretty interchangeably, and there isn't really a difference. High degree of feminine beauty.

It's not consider pedophilia for me because im under 18, but i still call it that cause i hate being left out.

At 1/7/08 12:00 AM, Metalix wrote: I'd like to announce, that THIS man is a pedophile. NO EXCEPTIONS.

OMG PEDOBEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

At 1/7/08 12:10 AM, NickDaPwner wrote: damn sir stanley, you are fucking pedophile, people like you should all die in fire
-peace

What exactly is bothering you?

At 1/6/08 09:52 PM, SirStanley wrote:
Is it so wrong to find her attractive? Personally, I don't see why everyone else isn't finding her attractive. She's extremely pretty.

yeah um any way you put it, thats kinda creepy. you should probably keep this stuff to yourself

At 1/7/08 12:15 AM, SirStanley wrote:

At 1/7/08 12:10 AM, NickDaPwner wrote: damn sir stanley, you are fucking pedophile, people like you should all die in fire
-peace

What exactly is bothering you?

It's probably that a 24 year old finding an 11 year old attractive is pedophillic and creepy. Think about it, your wallpaper is Adair Tishler, most of your submissions on newgrounds involve Adair Tishler pictures (Some with the word "hot" in it), and your sig is just a compilation of many pictures of her that you tracked down. So without beating around the bush, you are a freak, a pedophile, a wierdo, and if I were a parent, I wouldn't trust you at all.

At 1/7/08 12:50 AM, jitterman wrote:

yeah um any way you put it, thats kinda creepy. you should probably keep this stuff to yourself

not like this hasn't happened before....

Lolita Lolita Lolita Lolita Lolita Lolitaaaaaaah!

At 1/7/08 12:54 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: There isn't a difference? There balley well is! You wouldn't say "That is a hot sunset" or "this plant is hot".

He's got a point there, the fact of the matter is that this guy doesn't have alot to cover up his pedophillia and is now shooting in the dark here.

At 1/7/08 12:54 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: There isn't a difference? There balley well is! You wouldn't say "That is a hot sunset" or "this plant is hot".

Yet, you can still find someone attractive without harboring obscene desires. Just so you know... I consider her personality and talent to contribute to her "hotness." It can be a lot of things; your interpretation here is not warranted.

However, I am trying to be sensitive to the concerns of the community, considering I want to be taken seriously here and have people enjoy my flash. I have removed the offending word, which seems to rile people up for no reason, from the title and description of the flash. It was never my intention to offend anyone, but hey, some people will get offended at anything. Hence, while I will try to avoid using language with objectionable connotations in the future, I know that people will continue to harass me and downvote my submissions. I wonder why I even bother.

At 1/7/08 01:24 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: Then you call her pretty, not hot. You can't go aorund reinventing the English language to any whim your fancy takes.

Oh right, because hot always denotes that the speaker harbors obscene thoughts regarding his subject. In my dictionary, it just says attractive. You can find someone attractive without being a dirty human being.

Even wierder, there is apparently a Crew devoted to her with more flash submissions that say that she is "hot". I almost threw up in my own liver when I saw this one. Eeeeww.

Discuss.

I said it was sick on his game and my review got deleted bc i thought it was disgusting.

Come on, you don't think in those tight little kid clothes they arn't just BEGGING for a cock in their ass/vagina/mouth? Besides, no one their age is going to have a dick comprable to an older guys. Just go with it.

GET THE FUCK IN MY VAN

At 1/7/08 01:23 AM, SirStanley wrote:

At 1/7/08 12:54 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: There isn't a difference? There balley well is! You wouldn't say "That is a hot sunset" or "this plant is hot".

Yet, you can still find someone attractive without harboring obscene desires. Just so you know... I consider her personality and talent to contribute to her "hotness." It can be a lot of things; your interpretation here is not warranted.

Personality? You mean the one she portrays on television because a script told her to? Honestly if that contributes, then you should probably look at obsession towards the writing staff of Heroes.

However, I am trying to be sensitive to the concerns of the community, considering I want to be taken seriously here and have people enjoy my flash. I have removed the offending word, which seems to rile people up for no reason, from the title and description of the flash. It was never my intention to offend anyone, but hey, some people will get offended at anything. Hence, while I will try to avoid using language with objectionable connotations in the future, I know that people will continue to harass me and downvote my submissions. I wonder why I even bother.

It doesn't offend anyone, it just helps explain your pedophilia. Like for instance, we know you are a pedophile from how many flashes you have as a tribute to her, or your sig, or the picture you posted of your desktop and the wallpaper just so happened to be a picture of her. You probably shouldn't bother at all, it's already out there. I suggest a new start with a new account.

At 1/6/08 08:08 PM, Straight-Edge wrote: About 99.09% of newgrounders are pedophiles.

Actually Enoll joined the club so it's 99.10% pedophiles.

At 1/6/08 08:51 PM, SaltshakerClock wrote: crap. and, this isn't against the law for pedos to take pictures of children and fap to them and maybe sell them on the internet, and this child has no idea?

well as long as it's not child porn. it isn't illegal just wrong

Damn right.Though I'm not a pedophile.