At 3/8/08 03:48 PM, UnknownFury wrote:
At 3/8/08 03:39 PM, Paranoia wrote:
It's annoying how many people don't know the difference between the scientific and colloquial meanings of 'theory' :s
My bad (looking at actual definitions). But you get what I mean ;)
Yeah, I was making more of a general statement than one directed at you :) Seriously - anyone who doesn't know what the scientific definition of a 'theory' is should look it up. Here's what Wiki has to say:
In science, a theory is a mathematical or logical explanation, or a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition. For example, it is a fact that an apple dropped on earth has been observed to fall towards the centre of the planet, and the theories commonly used to describe and explain this behaviour are Newton's theory of universal gravitation (see also gravitation), and the theory of general relativity.
...
"Some scientific explanations are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them. The explanation becomes a scientific theory. In everyday language a theory means a hunch or speculation. Not so in science. In science, the word theory refers to a comprehensive explanation of an important feature of nature that is supported by many facts gathered over time. Theories also allow scientists to make predictions about as yet unobserved phenomena."
It's just really irritating - the nature of good science is such that it can be easily exploited by people who have a personal bias and little actual understanding.