At 4/29/13 01:28 PM, JellyTea wrote: They also influence others to sleep around by claiming things like, ''it's just sex, nah big deel'' etc.

Its not a big deal. Plz lose your virginity before replying.

I hate sluts. I'm can't get it up so I take my anger out on them!

At 4/29/13 12:42 PM, Grotty wrote:

At 4/29/13 02:23 AM, LemonCrush wrote: Nothing is wrong with sluts...fuck who you want, whenever, just don't be pissed off when real people don't want to touch the cesspool you call your life.

Implying sluts aren't real people.

Ever met an emotionally or financialy stable sluts?

Even the term 'slut' used by the OP is distinctive of a society viewpoint that if a woman sleeps around she's somehow equivalent to a prostitute, it's completely hypocritical because a man who does exactly the same thing gets congratulated for it. It's a very old fashioned, 50s, Christian morality hangover from a different era, we live in a modern society where we shouldn't judge a woman on her sexual life if its done between consenting adults who are honest with each other.

Having nothing for your life going other than being a throw pillow to guy's penises?

Yeah, a slut is reaaaaally great. They are totally in perfection for having a vagina that leaks nonstop and smells like Limburger cheese. Nothing is more beautiful than saggy tits and a bruised body from constant pounding.

Oh yes, nothing like sex from a grody person, rather from a nice person. Yup, sluts are totally the way to go, even if I get genital warts.

At 4/28/13 09:16 PM, Thoth0 wrote: being a "slut" is being a giver and a reciever

it strives towards oneness, all must give and recieve, like water, to become one

sex is the moral way forward

Lol, this guy^.

At 4/29/13 04:15 PM, Fim wrote: Even the term 'slut' used by the OP is distinctive of a society viewpoint that if a woman sleeps around she's somehow equivalent to a prostitute, it's completely hypocritical because a man who does exactly the same thing gets congratulated for it. It's a very old fashioned, 50s, Christian morality hangover from a different era, we live in a modern society where we shouldn't judge a woman on her sexual life if its done between consenting adults who are honest with each other.

But this is not the case. Because most "modern day" sluts are dishonest, and usually have 2 or 3 dicks in them at all times and strive to hurt people on a consistant basis and are only out there for themselves.

At 4/29/13 04:51 PM, Boomstick wrote: Yeah, a slut is reaaaaally great. They are totally in perfection for having a vagina that leaks nonstop and smells like Limburger cheese. Nothing is more beautiful than saggy tits and a bruised body from constant pounding.

You're just pointing out a bunch of stereotypes that aren't even necessarily true. Even if sex somehow ruined your body or appearance, drawing a direct connection between quantity of sex and bodily degradation would mean that having sex twenty times with one guy is the same as having sex once with twenty different people.

At 4/29/13 12:55 PM, Prinzy2 wrote: I like the idea of being fucked by someone with standards, knowing most other people don't meet those standards.

Okay, what are 'standards'? It's not as if there's some universal law about them.

At 4/29/13 01:04 PM, JellyTea wrote: Because they depreciate the emotional value of what some think sex has.

I wouldn't say so. That's like saying that you depreciate food because you eat at a fast food restaurant every once in a while. Not all sex is equal. Just because you can have meaningless sex doesn't mean you can't have meaningful sex. For the record, I would consider kissing someone I love to be 'going farther' with someone than having sex with someone I didn't, and I don't really feel any adversity toward doing either.

At 4/29/13 03:26 PM, selena wrote:

At 4/29/13 12:55 PM, Prinzy2 wrote: I like the idea of being fucked by someone with standards, knowing most other people don't meet those standards.

It's an ego thing.

lol Prinzy, I know you're not having any sex. Come on now

Just sluts.

At 4/29/13 05:47 PM, Kwing wrote:

Okay, what are 'standards'? It's not as if there's some universal law about them.

Standards

At 4/29/13 07:13 PM, Prinzy2 wrote: Standards

You know damn well what I mean. 'Standards' is completely subjective.

At 4/29/13 04:04 PM, LemonCrush wrote:

At 4/29/13 12:42 PM, Grotty wrote:

At 4/29/13 02:23 AM, LemonCrush wrote: Nothing is wrong with sluts...fuck who you want, whenever, just don't be pissed off when real people don't want to touch the cesspool you call your life.

Implying sluts aren't real people.

Ever met an emotionally or financialy stable sluts?

Implying people with emotional issues or financial problems aren't people, either.

Risk of STD's and pregnancy

...but hey, that's their own risk they chose to take. The only reason it's viewed bad morally is because religion and the norm it's constructed.

In my book, it's morally okay to be a slut, as long as you aren't in a committed relationship.

Depends if it's a sleezy sleep around slut or just a rumored one.

I went my entire life through grade 1-12 being called a slut even though I just lost my virginity to my fiance last year.

Then there's the ones who actually sleep around and they're praised because they get all of that attention and everyone loves that kind of shit.

When I had my first boyfriend in 9th grade I remember a girl giving me a piece of advice; not to end up like her taking 12 cocks in her ass in one night. She gave that kind of advice to everyone and for some reason everyone loved her.

At 4/29/13 01:28 PM, JellyTea wrote:

At 4/29/13 01:08 PM, FattyWhale wrote:

At 4/29/13 01:04 PM, JellyTea wrote: Because they depreciate the emotional value of what some think sex has.

How does someone else's sex life (completely removed from yours) affect your perception of sex?

Their promiscuous lifestyles influence others. If sex is more easily obtainable, males are less likely to pursue actual relationships because the desire for sex is mostly what drives them. And if more people are having sex because it's more easily obtainable, they make others feel bad for not having it even shaming virgins etc. They also influence others to sleep around by claiming things like, ''it's just sex, nah big deel'' etc.

Gotta agree with this guy. Sex has special meaning to a lot of people, I know you horny young dudes on the internet think that's impossible but yeah, some guys and plenty of girls think the idea of throwing yourself at the nearest willing participant is shameful, and show's you don't value your body and "depreciate" the emotional value many people hold in their hearts. And really, "shame" is a word that doesn't translate well on the internet because that implies having pride, which apparently is unheard of on the internet. Well, a lot of people have it and watching someone IRL (scary place, I know) throw it out the window for the more animalistic concept of sex is very off putting and to many, a pitiable thing, and of course, very condemning.

You see, many people, including myself are more Freudian thinkers who believe that deep down, we strive for a "perfect" form of person that embodies all the noble and respected traits of humanity (compassion, strength, honor, courage, etc.) and the enemy of these most noble and saintly traits are the animilistic ones imbued on us by nature, such as the urge to mate with anything that has the opposite sex's genitalia. This deeply primal urge contrasts starkly (too much so) with the noble qualities of self-control, prudence, and holding a higher value for your body. We are in constant battle against our primal urges to obtain (at least somewhat) the "perfect" form that carves out the pillars of the morals of society, that's why we diet, that's why we learn manners, that's why we help those who need it and rescue those in danger. If we were truly primal creatures, these things would never happen because they counteract with what nature intends for us to do (mainly): Mate, Eat, Survive.

But these qualities are too base, too much like an animal, and we think we're better than that, so we fight against them, we put ourselves in danger to help others, fight food cravings to obtain fitness, and act prudently towards sexual desires to manifest an image of saintly self-control. All things humanitarian and respected have nothing to do with sex and everything to do with how we perceive ourselves and how others perceive us. However, we can not snub out these primal urges, thus, a certain balance is kept to satisfy our desires while still holding true to our goal of a "perfect" self. Sluts ignore this balance, or deeply lean to the more primal side, this total lack of self-control and giving in to desire is most shameful, and most retrograde to our deep desire for the perfect form, too much so like an animal, thus, it is looked down upon.

At 4/29/13 04:51 PM, BasedBubbus wrote:

At 4/29/13 04:15 PM, Fim wrote: Even the term 'slut' used by the OP is distinctive of a society viewpoint that if a woman sleeps around she's somehow equivalent to a prostitute

it takes much more work for a man to sleep with a bunch of women

From my experience women are just as up for it as men, probably more. Unless you're a ugly unconfident tramp it's pretty easy to pick up women.

At 4/29/13 04:59 PM, HoboPorn wrote:

At 4/29/13 04:15 PM, Fim wrote: Even the term 'slut' used by the OP is distinctive of a society viewpoint that if a woman sleeps around she's somehow equivalent to a prostitute, it's completely hypocritical because a man who does exactly the same thing gets congratulated for it. It's a very old fashioned, 50s, Christian morality hangover from a different era, we live in a modern society where we shouldn't judge a woman on her sexual life if its done between consenting adults who are honest with each other.

But this is not the case. Because most "modern day" sluts are dishonest, and usually have 2 or 3 dicks in them at all times and strive to hurt people on a consistant basis and are only out there for themselves.

That's why I said as long as they do it within the context of consenting adults who are honest with each other, I don't think the term slut means your out to hurt someone, it just means you have sex a lot.

Sluts are cool, it isn't a title you get lying down. Oh...wait..

At 4/30/13 02:05 AM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: Gotta agree with this guy. Sex has special meaning to a lot of people, I know you horny young dudes on the internet think that's impossible but yeah, some guys and plenty of girls think the idea of throwing yourself at the nearest willing participant is shameful, and show's you don't value your body and "depreciate" the emotional value many people hold in their hearts.

You still haven't touched on what I said about junk food. There's a difference between someone who goes to McDonalds once every month or two and someone who eats there four times a week. I've had 'lustful' encounters with people, but that doesn't take away from my ability to more greatly appreciate a bond that is simultaneously physical and emotional.

You see, many people, including myself are more Freudian thinkers who believe that deep down, we strive for a "perfect" form of person that embodies all the noble and respected traits of humanity (compassion, strength, honor, courage, etc.) and the enemy of these most noble and saintly traits are the animilistic ones imbued on us by nature, such as the urge to mate with anything that has the opposite sex's genitalia.

Social constructs like pride, or the labels I'm given by other people bear little meaning to me. I think the idea of morality is stupid, because it implies that a person should be expected to behave a certain way because of what someone else thinks. When it comes down to it, morality is about a collective of people that want to control others with their own personal opinions.

Besides, compassion, strength, honor and courage are only respected because they help societies remain cohesive. The only idea sex is thought of as something special is because of the consequences of it; nothing is inherently wrong or right about it. However, given our ability to protect ourselves from unintended pregnancy and diseases, the moral conflict would be effectively nullified if not for old-fashioned people who believe that there is something other than utilitarianism that determines right and wrong.

This deeply primal urge contrasts starkly (too much so) with the noble qualities of self-control, prudence, and holding a higher value for your body. We are in constant battle against our primal urges to obtain (at least somewhat) the "perfect" form that carves out the pillars of the morals of society, that's why we diet, that's why we learn manners, that's why we help those who need it and rescue those in danger. If we were truly primal creatures, these things would never happen because they counteract with what nature intends for us to do (mainly): Mate, Eat, Survive.

Ah, western culture is so phobic of nature it makes me sick. Society would be a better place if it participated in animal worship. As I've just stated, there is ZERO point in controlling ourselves so long as the negative consequences of our actions can be circumvented.

However, we can not snub out these primal urges, thus, a certain balance is kept to satisfy our desires while still holding true to our goal of a "perfect" self.

Must you be so... Progressive? You speak as if it is somehow our obligation to better ourselves or live up to some bogus arbitrary standard of living. There is literally no difference between saving the world from a nuclear holocaust and putting a sticky note on your forehead that says "Hero", because there is no such thing as unbiased judgment. That being the case, I don't understand why people torture themselves over self improvement when it's always up to them to decide who they are.

At 4/30/13 02:36 AM, BasedBubbus wrote: literally any woman can probably walk outside and someone is going to want to fuck her

That might be true for men too, but how would anyone know? It's just a basic rule of society that men have to make the first move. Men are also expected to take the initiative and be more sexual, which means that men might not be inherently that much more sexual than women.

At 4/30/13 03:37 PM, Cootie wrote: I don't see why people care what others do in situations like this. If a man or woman wants to fuck LITERALLY every single person that they come across what business is it of yours? People need to stop policing others sex life.

Because it isn't just them that's involved, people don't have sex ALONE. There is a partner.
What if a slut sleeps with a married man and ruins their marriage and breaks apart their family?
Wouldn't it be their business then?

Being a slut is like a a lock and a key, the guy is the key.
A lock, that's opened by one key is a pretty good lock.
A lock that can be opened by any key, is a pretty shitty lock.

At 4/28/13 09:39 PM, Jester wrote: Sluts are fine, whores are gross.

Well said

Being a slut is totally cool... as long as you play safe. Being open and comfortable with your sexuality is a good thing. The only problem is a practical one: it hurts if you want to experience love with somebody, but sex becomes 'safer' than love so you keep going to that instead, and never get the thing you truly want.

At 4/29/13 08:46 PM, Grotty wrote: Implying people with emotional issues or financial problems aren't people, either.

Ok......