At 8/24/04 05:29 AM, carmelhadinosaur wrote: Sorry about the double-post but now its better i hope..
And thanks for rating the sings i made =)
lol nice sig! 8.5/10
At 8/24/04 07:05 AM, -AERO- wrote: lol nice sig! 8.5/10
Thanks!
Hehe another one lol...
At 8/24/04 09:45 AM, Fire_Tyger wrote: RATE MY SIG OR YOU ARE NOT 1337
Its really not all that good. The images look kidna outta proportion and the backgroun is WAY to plain. The text is also kinda bad looking. The overall look of the sig makes it seem like it was made in a hurry and just slapped together. 3/10,
At 8/24/04 09:48 AM, carmelhadinosaur wrote: Hehe another one lol...
damn dude you just love shit loads of color don't you?
Anyway, I like the way the font and the background go together in this one, it looks great to me. I would just make the rest of the background like the part that is behind the text and then kinda fade it into the BBS background color. 6/10.
At 8/24/04 10:46 AM, FrostyBear wrote: Rate these sigs, plz.
Alright, the top one looks really nice. However the yellow just doesn't fit all that well in that sig. You should make it look more like rock, like the rest of the sig and then make it look like it is inset into the sig. Thats the only problem, but it is a big problem. The yellow just doesn't fit at all. 5/10. Blend it better and it would be a 8/10.
The second one is by far better. It looks so much better. The only thing that bugs me is the look of the font, how it looks so jagged and shit, I would smooth it out a bit. Then, theres is also the border on the guy on the left. The border around him doesn't match the rest of the border and kinda gives the sig a weird look. But it is still nice, 7/10.
At 8/24/04 10:53 AM, FrostyBear wrote: Thanks for the tips, Quik.
No problem. You want some advise on how to do things or what it looks like, feel free to stop by here, I'll rate every sig as soon as I can.
How long have you been making sigs by the way? They look pretty good for someone who has just started out making them.
How long have you been making sigs by the way? They look pretty good for someone who has just started out making them.
Maybe a year or so but I only make a sig now and then, Maybe I made 10 sigs or something. Btw do you think this better? Not much has changed but I fixed the overlapping of boarder on the cs guy.
At 8/24/04 11:14 AM, FrostyBear wrote: Not much has changed but I fixed the overlapping of boarder on the cs guy.
I think it looks much better. One more piece of advise, add a very small stroke outlining the text so it can stand out just a tad bit more. I can't really see any difference between the border of this one and the 1st one. I thought the border on the 1st one was just fine. 8/10.
I don't really get it what you mean with the outlining (maybe I'm bad at English), Oh check the pick for that border thingie.
At 8/24/04 11:27 AM, FrostyBear wrote: I don't really get it what you mean with the outlining (maybe I'm bad at English),
Around the text, where you have written "FrostyBear" add an outline to that text, a stroke to that text. It will make the text stand out a bit more, but won't make it look completely seperate from the sig.
Oh check the pick for that border thingie.
Ohhh, I see it now. Ahhh, how'd you catch that, I didn't see it, haha. Nice that you caught it and fixed it.
Which color should I use for the outline ? Or texture. Maybe I just don't get it, I think I know what you mean with the stroke, but the outline is a little problem. You're helping greatly, though.
At 8/24/04 11:41 AM, FrostyBear wrote: Which color should I use for the outline ?
I would try a black and see what that looks like. But you should just play around with it and see which looks best to you.
I think I'm going to leave it as it is now, cause it wont work that well with that font. I hope I will make some great sigs sooner or later.
At 8/24/04 11:57 AM, FrostyBear wrote: I hope I will make some great sigs sooner or later.
That one your using now will make a pretty good start for them now, I also went thru your previous posts, some of them, and saw some other nice sigs. Keep working and learning new things and you'll get along great.
Any tips for the sig I'm using right now and this one?
At 8/24/04 01:24 PM, ___ wrote: Any tips for the sig I'm using right now and this one?
On the one you posted get rid of that outline around the underlines. It make it look way to thick and kinda ugly. You should also add much much more to it since it looks kinda plains since you have such a plain name. 5/10.
This one is really nice looking. I especially like the background. But I could do without the guitar and I would add a border to it. 8/10.
At 8/24/04 01:40 PM, Jet_Ninjin wrote: rate mine
K, No.
At 8/24/04 04:14 PM, QuikFox wrote: Would anybody care to rate this sig of mine?
I will. It ain't your best work but I like it. I would have made a border around the picture (pink ofcourse). 7.5/10 and with the border 8/10
At 8/24/04 04:25 PM, Plan-B wrote: I will. It ain't your best work but I like it. I would have made a border around the picture (pink ofcourse). 7.5/10 and with the border 8/10
Wait. It has a border but it is small. Make it a bit bigger and it is worth a 9/10. Now it is worth a 8.5/10. Forget the results in the quoted post.
At 8/24/04 04:02 AM, QuikFox wrote:At 8/23/04 12:50 PM, AC500BELOW wrote: after you rate those, rate thisOMG, greatness. This sig is just fuckin awesome. I love it. Everything looks great and I wouldn't change anything except the border. I would either make it smaller, about 1 2 pixels max or transparent. 10/10.
i almosted orgasamed when you said it was fucking great. thanks! the guy i made it for missed it.
anyways, rate this:
At 8/25/04 01:39 AM, AC500BELOW wrote: i almosted orgasamed when you said it was fucking great. thanks! the guy i made it for missed it.
anyways, rate this:
please rate my new sig also.
How about the evil ump'z?
While you're at it, check out my avatar in my profile too . . . I think itz PERFECT for my nickname and I made both the avatar and my sig pic myself.
At 8/25/04 01:21 AM, belmont117 wrote: rate mine?
Way to plain and the image is cropped really shitty-like. I could make something better than that in about 5 minutes in MS Paint. 1/10.
At 8/25/04 01:39 AM, AC500BELOW wrote: anyways, rate this:
I think I did rat that one already, I remeber talking about the people in the background and shit like that. Also adding a black glow around the 2 solid Ermacs.
At 8/25/04 01:41 AM, AC500BELOW wrote: please rate my new sig also.
I love the background is that one, its great and it fits really nicely. Again, I would make the border smaller or transparent. I'm not really sure I like the image of the character you have on there, but its not horrible. I like the way you did the glow around the text also. 8/10.
At 8/25/04 02:43 AM, Silent1Hunter wrote: What about these two I made.
The white one that you posted sucks to be perfectly honest and all. It looks like it was made in paint and its just WAY to plain. 2/10.
This one is a bit better, although I would put more than 2 frames in when you have fire. The way the fire is going right now, just looks really bad, you need more frames and shit for the fire animation. I like the border, but you should also have one solid border around the edge of it, just to make the edges more like an finished edge. 5/10.
