Come on in, be a guy, pull up a chair!
Come on in, be a guy, pull up a chair!
At 7/1/10 01:54 PM, Blaze-Heatnix wrote:At 7/1/10 01:16 PM, Superperpel wrote: Would you say the same for World of Warcraft, or Super Mario Galaxy?Yes. This may be a foreign concept to you, but the words "addicting" and "fun" co-exist when it comes to games.
I never said World of Warcraft, Super Mario Galaxy, or Halo weren't fun or addicting, or that fun can be with addiction or whatever. I was trying to think of examples of popular games you might not enjoy, but since you do think they are fun they weren't effective ones.
I know the WORST of em all
Super Noas Arc 3D
i cant even say a thing just look it up
(its for SNES)
At 6/30/10 10:35 PM, SloppyMoe606 wrote:At 6/30/10 10:30 PM, Seventy7 wrote:Halo 1 was never a bad FPS. Heck, it started FPS' being popular along with Half Life.At 6/30/10 10:26 PM, Alex12345269 wrote:he said nothing about it being overrated, and yes. as an FPS, it's fucking terrible.At 6/30/10 10:23 PM, Im-A-Pirate wrote: Halo.Shut up, just because it's overrated doesn't mean it's bad.
not that MW2 is much better...
FPS has been popular since Doom. By the way, Halo isn't even in the same chapter as Half-life in the book of FPS.
At 7/1/10 02:16 PM, Blaze-Heatnix wrote:At 7/1/10 02:13 PM, Superperpel wrote: I never said World of Warcraft, Super Mario Galaxy, or Halo weren't fun or addicting, or that fun can be with addiction or whatever. I was trying to think of examples of popular games you might not enjoy, but since you do think they are fun they weren't effective ones.What I was trying to say that stating something like that as the worst FPS ever is obviously someone hating how popular and mainstream it is, so they find flaws that simply aren't there. There's a REASON everybody plays it and thinks it's good. Not liking something is one thing, thinking it's bad is another.
That's the point I was arguing with - People can say it's the worst FPS because they don't like it or think it's bad, there's not a whole lot of difference.. I think Call of Duty is one of the worst myself. No, it's not because it's more popular or more mainstreamed than what I like, it's just stupid to me. I don't see why it's popularity has to change the way I think of it. Yes, most people like it for the reasons that they think it is good, I don't like it for the reasons I think it's bad. It's popularity doesn't affect my opinion. I don't like how people assume that anyone who thinks a popular game is the worst game ever thinks that because of the number of people who play it.
I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet.
Conflict: Denied Ops
A game on the next gen that look liked a game from the late PS2 era. If anything, B.L.A.C.K. (great game) had better damned graphics than it. Another reason why it was so horrible was the choppiness, the framerate issues, the fact you have a choice of four guns. A silenced Deagle, an M249, a sniper rifle, and I believe a M9. All of these weapons have unlimited ammo, AND THEY ARE YOUR ONLY WEAPONS. You can't switch them up for an AK47 or shotgun. You are stuck with them forever. Online was the exact same way, only those weapon choices. There was no story, no real plot, nothing. It was simply horrible.
It brought shame to the Conflict series I so enjoyed playing
The worst one I've played would probably be Red Faction 2. It's not THAT bad, it just sucked a lot compared to RF 1, huge dissapointment for me.
At 7/1/10 02:50 PM, deathfun wrote: I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet.
Conflict: Denied Ops
It brought shame to the Conflict series I so enjoyed playing
Tell me about it, I got it for PC and it wouldn't even load.
At 7/1/10 05:59 AM, mmmburgers wrote: I think the worst FPS I played was XIII (Thirteen). Seriouisly, this game sucked so much. xD
You suck >:(
From what i remember that game was awesome!
At 7/1/10 02:26 PM, will222222 wrote: I know the WORST of em all
Super Noas Arc 3D
i cant even say a thing just look it up
(its for SNES)
Lol i saw the AVGN review it
At 7/1/10 01:24 AM, explodingbunnies wrote: On Topic : Unreal Gold or whatever it's called. Lame Enemies and weapons, odd graphics, and over all a boring game. Before you say shit let me tell you 2 things :
1. Read What I said above me being on topic.
2. I do know the game is very old.
I thought Unreal Gold was good, i didnt play it but Unreal Tournament the multiplayer Unreal was an excellent multiplayer FPS.
At 7/1/10 04:20 PM, MrPercie wrote: Team fortress 2!
What kind of man can take a sniper bullet to the head and survive?
or use explosions as a form of maneuver to reach high points?
unrealistic and too colourful, not enough grey, black and M4A1
LOL Gotta love sarcasm
Worst in my opinion was MW2. Not because of the maps or guns or nothin'(though part of the reason) but because I did not have a very good playing expirience. What with all the cheap kills and rude people.
At 7/1/10 02:26 PM, will222222 wrote: I know the WORST of em all
Super Noas Arc 3D
i cant even say a thing just look it up
(its for SNES)
I remember that game. It was basically Wolfenstein with a religous skin.
At 6/30/10 10:35 PM, SloppyMoe606 wrote:At 6/30/10 10:30 PM, Seventy7 wrote:Halo 1 was never a bad FPS. Heck, it started FPS' being popular along with Half Life.At 6/30/10 10:26 PM, Alex12345269 wrote:he said nothing about it being overrated, and yes. as an FPS, it's fucking terrible.At 6/30/10 10:23 PM, Im-A-Pirate wrote: Halo.Shut up, just because it's overrated doesn't mean it's bad.
not that MW2 is much better...
I thought Goldeneye, Doom, and Half Life made FPS popular. Don't get me wrong Halo had it's fair share of making FPS more popular into the next generation and practically killing the whole video game industry by making everyone realize that FPS were popular and that EVERYONE should make them instead of being clever and making more unique games that aren't ALL FPS.
Halo making the video game industry being more heavily based on FPS is why I hate it, not a bad game at all, but IMO it helped make the video game industry into a huge FPS mess.
Even though it's not first person. GEARS OF WAR.
Rushing, Boring firefights.
Formerly PuddinN64 - BBS, Icon, and Portal Mod
"Your friends love you anyway" - Check out Guinea Something Good!
At 7/1/10 09:41 PM, puddinN64 wrote: Dirge of Cerberus
FFVII should not be a FPS.
That was an FPS...? I thought it was a third-person action game.
At 7/1/10 01:20 AM, Greenfrost6 wrote: Please note, just because you don't like the game, doesn't mean it's the worst.
That means that MW2 isn't the worst FPS ever. It's actually a very good game, 'only problem is the community sucks ass.
Actually no... The community really isn't that bad. The maps, and perks, and glitches in general are what make the game not very
good.
That being said, the wosr FPS I've played was probably Command & Conquer: Renegade.
Rogue Warrior...that game...just sucked.
Bethesda should just stick to making glitchy rpgs
o.O
At 7/1/10 09:41 PM, puddinN64 wrote: Dirge of Cerberus
FFVII should not be a FPS.
If you ignore the ''Final Fantasy VII'' part and play it as its own game its pretty damn good.
World War II Combat: Road to Berlin followed immediately by an obvious re-skin called World War II Combat: Iwo Jima.
Haze.
I felt like killing myself after playing it for more than an hour.
At 7/1/10 10:19 AM, Jackho wrote: Call of Juarez
you better be talking about the first Call of Juarez. cause CoJ: Bound in Blood is one of the best FPS games ever
At 7/4/10 06:07 PM, Liquify wrote: Modern Warfare 2
LOL Why am I not surprised? :P
At 7/1/10 12:07 AM, mrfry wrote: Combat Arms.Nuff said.
I was actually going to download that soon. I guess I'll try it out anyway.
Halo is a good game by the way guys, I like the whole science fiction military stuff they have going on.
At 7/4/10 06:07 PM, Liquify wrote:
and it's not a FPS... it's a TPS... puddinN64 is an idiot.
Its both.
At 7/1/10 02:26 PM, will222222 wrote: I know the WORST of em all
Super Noas Arc 3D
i cant even say a thing just look it up
(I'm an AVGN fanboy)
That games amazing. I have no idea what you're talking about.