rednecks vs the world
orright game, kinda repetitive though, as has been said many a time. but i mainly want to point out an obvious difference between the two opposing groups in this debate, mainly that most(not all) anti war people seem to use arguments with reasoning and some(as far as is known) truth. On the other hand most of, and again not all, of the pro-war just shout and swear. another thing, if hating the pres is treason and unpatriotic, what about all the right wing religous types who loathed bill clinton? should they be shot for exercising free speech? neway thats the view from my part of AUS, so ill shut up now
ps John Howard (our "prez")is widely hated and seen as an ass-licker (of bush) by AUStralians. so there we gotta crap leader too