Um.... What???
The only reason you get 3 stars is because I scored a 900?????
Reviews for "BBQ Beef"
How did this not get blammed?
please consider translating everything because it is nonsense to us people who can't read it. Also it wasn't very fun to play, so consider other mini games next time for inspiration.
I dont speak or read japanese
This game is hard and boring to play so 3/10
alright
y is it in japanese!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and alright game a lil hard but good
I got 18060! Then 23520!
I was Acid Dimensions all those years ago by the way. I would have e-mailed but couldn't...
Anyway, first my review:
+++++ original concept
++++ Nice graphics. I really like the detail of the plates stacking up and the way you have a few different stages of being cooked. Though I think it goes too suddenly from 'raw' to 'done'. I think there should also be a 'slightly cooked but not cooked enough' stage.
+++++ Good length of game. Any longer, and it'd get boring. I really like how all your games are short and sweet.
Other than maybe a language option, I suggest you could have maybe colour-coded the messages for raw/good/overcooked (had some pale colours in the background of the speech bubble) and also made them stay on screen slightly longer.
Overall, it's a great game. And I'm not sure but I think I might have got the perfect score. (Though it may be possible to cook 6 more still.
==============================
Warning: don't read this - it's more fun to work out for yourself.
==============================
My method - I cooked 6 at a time. Lay 6 down. When the sizzle had died out, I'd quickly flip them all over, wait until the sizzle had died out again, then drag them into the bowl.
Repeat and if you don't make any mistakes you get a great score thanks to the way the score keeps increasing.
The difference between 18060 and 23520 was one set of 6 beef - each set should take 15s to cook.
I think 23520 really is a perfect score.
Well, I had fun working that all out. Thanks for making this highly original and wonderful game.