no offense but...
it's okay. I mean I can see you're frekin awesome at this, there's no questioning that. What I do wonder is why isn't the 'background' layer more in tune with the crazy gold vectors? In your other ones it's clearly a center focal point with radial vectored arcs of color. In this one it looks like you've just stuck an image behind your original work, and I hate to say it kinda taints is a but.
So I do get what you mean when you say loosing your touch a bit. This one, although fabulously good, unlike your other work lacks the compositional organization and the spatial qualities of blurring center focal points into continuous landscapes. In other words in this piece here I see two compositional languages that are clearly distinguishable, whereas in your other ones it tends to work better.
Beautiful work, but some compositional issues to deal with.