Very interesting game concept, I really enjoyed it. It was just a little too sarcastic for my tastes but overall still funny and enjoyable. The puzzles were easy for me until the last one with the arbitrary symbols.
Reviews for "ir/rational Redux"
tjubert responds:
Thanks. Yeah, I'd scale back a bit on the voice if I did it over, I think.
Not too happy with the ending, but meh, really nice game no doubt. I would love to see a sequel, which can be even harder :)
P.S: first time seeing the last challenge, I was like "the hell man?!"
tjubert responds:
If anyone wants to report their playtime it would be a really intersting stat for me. The thing about a harder sequel is that as many people would prefer an easier one!
So here's the thing. People are confused by this:
G
M->(G->A)
M
Because they think it's all one line and the G over the 2 M's is all one symbol, like putting a letter over another letter is some kind of operation. You could make it clearer by numbering each line the way the lines were numbered in all the other puzzles, like this:
1. G
2. M->(G->A)
3. M
If Michael Atkinson Is A Douche Who Wants To Ban Violent Games, Then He Must Be The Australian Version Of Jack Thompson.
By the way, why is it that almost of these philosophy-puzzle centric games portray the protagonist in a cube or some kind of white space?
Great game. Please make another one, but longer and without the drop down menu bug/issue.