Lol I like how if people just think about what they want to be, they can just be it. That is a fallacy. Sure anyone can believe they are something else but that doesn't make that person into that. That's call an illusion. I'm sorry but I can't take the idea that we are perfect, it just makes me laugh (no offense). I guess it depends on someone's perception but is it so bad to be flawed? Perfection, whatever someone's perception, cannot be reached. it is an unattainable goal that some people strive toward. But if someone was perfect, why would they "want" to be or have anything else. That means they wouldn't need anything if they were perfect (because wants corresponds to needs i.e. I want to live, so therefore I need food, water, etc (because people don't need to live, they want to live - evidence, people commit suicide every day)). This is saying that someone is perfect in whatever form or job they do and that they can change that form or job if they want and still be perfect. This hits me as if saying "well , your perfect now, why change?" and makes me feel as if I have no mobility because hey, I'm already perfect and because I'm perfect I don't have to have anything added or taken away from me. What this is saying is a contradiction unless people are suppose to stay in their place because that is the only way people would fill the criteria of being perfect (i.e not needing anything) . But people aren't happy being this so called "perfect." The average person (unless hes/she is a masochist) who consistently feels pain and stress doesn't think they are perfect because they want to be happy. The only way to achieve that happiness is to change and perfection doesn't need to change. Ergo, the argument is false. The only true perfection is God for he needs nothing to subsist and everything subsists from him (he doesn't need to change). Calling humans divine is funny because we need so much to simply exist.
My bad if i got you wrong and interpreted this in a different way then you meant it to come out but this is what i got from it. If you can reply to me that would be nice but please defend or elaborate on what you were trying to say and not attack my belief in God because that would just be avoiding my question. My question is how does this make logical sense? (no offense btw, I just don't get it)