F-IN A
That game dosent seem what you would think it would be its a great game all together its additive as can be i didnt stop playing till i had it beat OMG whish it had more levels to play deffinetly gets a full 10 of 10
Reviews for "Nuclearoids"
Short but not bad.
The game was dificult, and chalenging enough, interesting mechanics and the special types were really nice touches. But, as I said, it's too short. Add a level pack or something, and this will be a much better game, and would earn that last star.
Not "random"
Great game. A bit frustrating at times, but fun. I think if you make another, you should make it so the levels have more than one click to get things going (like, say some levels have 2 or 3 clicks). To make it even more fun, you could give them a "par", so if you go over you can move on, but you didn't make the actual goal (like golf).
To those that are claiming it's random... what happens if you drop three bouncy balls? You could claim it's random, but it's not... everything moves in very predictable ways. It's just too much for most people to look at and figure out a possible solution.
Not really.
The 6 rating I gave you was for the orginal idea, the colorful effects, and the unique powers, and the fact that the game worked.
You didn't get the last 4 points because it wasn't really much of a game for me. It seemed like a happy random click fest, most of it was based on luck. You clicked in what seemed like a good location, but many times you would fall short of a goal because one nucleroid was just slightly effected by a black hole, and missed another. The stratagy was lost because after you clicked once, you couldn't do anything to help aim. It's just not fun to try to beat a level 40 times because each time something different screws you up.
I agree with Connor53
But I also think that there should be more levels and more challenging levels because it wasn't very hard but it was still a very fun game.