Fucking Amazing
I loved it man. It was awesome. Can't believe that over 3 million took that test.
Reviews for "Video Games Report"
not true.
Ok i can prove you wrong on this. I love playing video games and i play them at minimum 2 hours a day. The only games i have that arent rated M or AO(adults only) are my NFL games. I'm in HS and the lowest grade i've ever gotten is a B-. And I don't believe i have a temper either, unless someone would happen to get into a fight with me or something and thats not a temper that is just getting mad because sombody hit you. Just go about your research more carefully next time.
wonderful......
except i cant get to the acknowlegements page please fix it please!! other than that this is cool
Must show more info
I must see what the anger test was and how it was scored... such data could explane the strange conclusion that is reached... I would suspect you tested violent nature and not anger... I personally like to blow up small animals in games..but would never dream of doing so in real life..and if tested on a game related test and asked if I would like to see babies eaten in a game..i would say yes..but this doesn't make me angry.. also..I happen to be very hard to upset in any way... sept maybe intellectually..thats not anger..thats furver..all of these are not the same...grades are a good gauge however..as the number of hours goes up you would expect a decline in grades....also..the graphs you used were the wrong kind... I would like to see games hours played vrs grades...not each item vrs person/people as you had it... such a graph tells you nothing but small details.. a graph of eacg item vrs each other item will show you things that are related..(if they are related you'll find almost a line...if not related you will fine a field of dots) good science is displayed in a thought out mannor... this was thought out in its presentation but not in the presentation of your content..your contents presentation appeared to be stilted and unuseable... I find a lot of this kind of research is selected to show the hypothosis and not the actual conclusion...in this sense i have to say that this is bad science and should be discredited.... If re-submited with all the information and proper graphs i'll reconsider my standing..... and yes...i am a nerd
My two cents
Well,I put in maybe 50+ hours a week, but I am an honours student and I play games ranging from E to M. This all really depends on the personality of a person to begin with, i don't think someone intelligent who begins playing games and then starts playing more violent games will all of sudden turn baddass. It all depends on a persons personal values. If you never held school as a top priority, perhaps it would be poor without a video games intervention. I think the ranges of certain graphs through a total population would have such a large variety of results that any conclusion you could up up with would be practically irrevelant to what the effects video games have on people.