Hahaha
Some people just dont understand this game, its brilliant haha.
Hahaha
Some people just dont understand this game, its brilliant haha.
lol, thanks.
That was fun ,simple overly complicated fun.
Liked the retro look and the reference to the buried stash of games in the desert.
MAke it longer i didn't blow enough stuff up.
Lol, it's always about the length, nowadays, isn't it?
I kept it short because I knew I had small fuel to run on, you don't want something repetitive, do you?
Unenjoyable Soap Box?
I really don't understand what you're trying to express here. How much of what was said in the game represents your beliefs and how much is a parody? Was the entire point of the game just some shallow message about the effects of consumerism on creativity? Because if so it was poorly executed. I may have gotten everything wrong. If you can, please explain the deeper meaning of this game, because if a game is repetitive and not fun it should have a powerful message behind it to compensate. This came off as a poor man's Jason Rohrer, and I hate Jason Rohrer.
But the game was relatively well made though. I just didn't enjoy it. At least it was better than Passage.
Well, the message is up for your own interpretation.
It's first and foremost a parody, but there are things in there worth a second look.
easiest game ever
-easy
-boring
-talk, talk, talk, talk
-easy again
- worst game ever
-a duck... what the fuck is that
-and a colored guy at the end ( you were too lazy to make the entire game colored )
ps: the easiest and worst game i had ever played
It would've actually been easier to make the entire game colored...
wow
THE GAME REALLY SUCKED, BUT was that the g-man at the end?
cuz that would be so cool
It definably was a reference.