Reviews for Fågelskrämman

[frPOW]

Artwork was great... but it wasn't interesting.

Great artwork and beautiful animation, but you should think of a better script in your future works.
This was kind of repetitive and it has a lot of cliches in it (the glowing dove for example...)
If you are original in both story-writing ánd animation I think you will be able to make very good shorts, but with this one I just feel like you took a wrong turn.
I have to agree with the other reviewers, you have a lot of potential, but next time try to be a little more original in your story-line.

[Dark-scarecrow]

Damn!!! I love it!!!!

so sad..... so sublime....... so beatiful...... I hope to see more of your work.

[113420]

excellently done!

while it is masterfully atmospheric, there are a few glaring flaws that get me when i watch it. i understand the pain and the sorrow of the scarecrow and the hard to see bird thing and blah blah blah blah blah you get enough compliments on that. i am here to bring things to a literal level!
okay, major flaw #1: inconsistency! sometimes the mouth things were torn, then they were repaired, and it fluctuated. that's confusing.
#2! no degradation! while the bird crap and the tear were always there, the tear would get gradually worse and the bird crap would eventually go away. also the mouth thingy. and! if snow is piling onto it and making it sag, it wouldn't go back to normal! it would keep sagging more and more! and while the full extent of the sagging is illustrated at the end, i dont get the feel that it's dying as much as it is trapped in an endless loop. so yeah, that would be sad if the bird crap and gun wound were highlights in your life. but i just dont think you captured the effect quite right. could use a little refining there!
anyway! it doesn't get a perfect score because there's room for improvement! but i still thought it was very good and all of that clarification stuff ima go play mario.

[keiri-rar]

Great concept.

Anyone who thinks that the storyline is dumb because a scarecrow is an inanimate object is clearly a retard and cannot think beyond the literal.

Anyway, I loved the animation, extremely smooth animation and artwork. I don't know why but the angle of that scene with the bird poop was pretty darn cool.

5/5 10/10, I loved this short.

[stickbob123]

'the frick?

what the heck? that was MINDBLOWING animation and all, but seriously. its a scarecrow. it's an inanimate object. it has no feelings so it was'nt emotional. that eleminates that. second is that the ending is frikking weird. it cries and then blows up into a dove. wow im touched, not. it gets a 3 out of 5 because story and ending stinks but you have huge potential with that kind of animation. Try again, next time go for a better story line.

Daani responds:

oh god I hate these kinds of reviews...so let's put it like this: Does blockhead excist in real life? Since no yellow-headed dude excists in real life he can't be funny? So everything that doesn't excist or behaves exactly like in real life can't be enjoyed? That's where you need imagination. I-M-A-G-I-N-A-T-I-O-N. so, seriously, this is an animation! NOT real life! This is where you can create things that doesn't need to have gravity, space and can include magic or whatever you like.