00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

soniccrackers23 just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Reviews for "The Adventures of Steve 3"

Hmm

So after 20 months you have finally release a new episode of The Adventures of Steve to the portal. This episode is a huge improvement from your previous episodes, and also a little bit of a disappointment, as well. I am glad that you finally implemented actual lip-syncing into your characters mouths instead of using a loop of their lips moving up and down. The main problem I had was the writing and animation. Compared to your other episodes, the comedy is a bit lacking. Your other episodes were extremely funny and random. That's what made them so enjoyable. This episode, however, seems more like a serious attempt at an actual story than a comedy flash. This is fine, but when your first two episodes in the series contain nothing but random humor and gags, it doesn't make much sense to change that formula. The animation was the biggest problem. Although the action scenes were well animation with a few short scenes of frame-by-frame animation, most of this consisted of tweens. A few tweens are okay, but when 95% of the flash consists of just tweens, then we have a problem. When the characters are talking to each other, they look like mindless dolls. They never move from their position and their bodies look like a piece of wood. The running scene was also a huge problem. They look like they had irritated armpits and refuse to move their arms more in fear of getting them more irritated. You also recycled the running animation from Steve for Steve's boss. That shows many continuity issues. Why would someone run exactly like someone else? Sometimes taking a shortcut in animation is not always a good thing. Overall, it was a huge improvement in terms of animation and lip-sync. But the animation still needs a lot of work to show believable human movements. The writing needs to go back to the original formula instead of a serious flash. Good luck on future episodes.

I couldn't do it I am sorry!!!

I cannot Cannot rate this any better like the rest of the crowd. I thought that you just didn't grab my attention in the first 8 seconds of this production. And then I waited a bit longer. Then dialog.... done.

Neo-Egyptian responds:

Wow, that's... quite dramatic! But hey thanks for the review anyway, I'm quite impressed that I got a 6 even though you didn't really watch beyond the first line of dialogue. If it makes you feel any better, Steve 4's opening is going to be pretty awesome, so hopefully the first eight seconds of the next episode will grab your attention!

I didn't like it but ill give u a 5 for effort.

The drawings were actually pretty good. I think Jimmy was supposed to be comic relief but turned out quite annoying. So was Steve's but Jimmy's was worse. The action was okay but didn't catch me. Some of the adults looked like kids. At least I can see you tried though. Also, soom of the gun wounds were too big. I don't know what kinda bullets Steve was using but they must have been huge. Next time work harder on the humor and action.

Neo-Egyptian responds:

Well, I can't say I quite agree with all your criticism - the size of the gun wounds in particular is perhaps nitpicking just a bit too much - but thanks for the advice, I'll keep some of it in mind.

Could be a lot better

lol, i have yet to see many blond green eyes Colombians lol.

Nice video, but ur animation/movements and drawing need work. Story was nice and the voices/sound and effects were good. Some good jokes, but the animation just took away from it cuz there was barely any movement and the times there were it was very stiff and robotic. I say work on ur drawing skills and learn some better animating techniques and u can have a pretty good series on here.

Neo-Egyptian responds:

I do indeed need to add more movement to the characters, thanks for the review.

Ehh

Hmm.. what can i say?
First, i really like the backgrounds.
The buildings, the bar, the village and the airplane was nicely DRAWN.
However, the COLOURING itself looked extremly unprofessional.
The characters barely moved, which shows that this was not even animated...
It was small, odd moves - not really worthy to be called "animation" .
You cant get away with nice voices, it doesnt work.

Eitherway i can give you more, because i judge Animation, Art, Backgrounds, Story, Sounds - But specially ANIMATION.

Story was .... kind of ridiciolus.
And the shooting sounds were patethic - Could you not have gotten anything better? This animation lacks on many places.

Improve on these points, and you will recieve higher reviews.

Thank you!

P.

5/10

3/10

Neo-Egyptian responds:

I generally respond to criticism in a positive way and appreciate how most of the more critical reviews I've had for Steve 3 have been constructive and polite in tone. However, yours has managed to genuinely irritate me, so allow me to retort:

Your most recent cartoon is a visual abomination, done almost entirely in monochrome and being around 90% tweened, the other 10% comprising embarrassingly basic frame-by-frame. While you speak of my 'extremely unprofessional' colouring, you've barely used any yourself, despite the fact vibrant colour in certain scenes would have made an excellent contrast between the woman's past and her present. Yes, criticising your work purely because you've criticised mine is a cheap shot, but you come across like you're a master of animation when you can't even apply your criticisms to your own work.

Aside from this, I really cannot stand 'high and mighty' reviews, especially where you've said things like my cartoon is not worthy to be called animation, and that I should 'improve on these points, and you will receive higher reviews'. Oh thank you, master of the visual arts and Newgrounds extraordinaire! Before I had your excellent advice to guide me, I didn't realise that people responded well to improved animation!

Look, I appreciate that this cartoon is not perfect - I did in fact make a lengthy post on my website regarding my own criticisms of the episode, and have since been spending a lot of time reading Richard Williams' guides to animating and trying to learn loads of new techniques for future cartoons. However, there are ways to be critical that mean you don't come across like a hypocritical asshole - you use several throw-away insults when describing my animation and voice acting, essentially saying I can't do it and it doesn't work. Thanks, that's very constructive, and not remotely judgemental given the quality of your own work!

Improve on these points, and you will receive a positive response from me.

Thank you!

T.

1/10

1/10