Like the fat guy in blockhead said:
Stop. Just... just stop. I like sonic, but this is totally too much. And overrated. I mean, most of these shorts (check the one that fits): Had no comical timing/style/value, Had no meaning (were random), Had no proper graphics or animation, Had no ... well whatever, you get the idea. Most of these shorts weren't funny, or well animated. There i said it. Don't wanna be rude or anything, but seriously, you could have shoved out at least 3/4 of those shorts, and the collab would have looked much better.
If you want cmments on each one of the animations presented, here they are: The first one was ridiculous, and really unoriginal. Seriously, just how many times has that kind of idea been used?Many. The second one was slightly better, with not too detailed graphics and bad animation. The twist had nothing funny. The third one was sort of funny, but not very far-fetched. The fourth one didn't look like it had taken a lot of effort, and the joke was pretty old. Felt like re-heated stuff. The fifth one was a great improvement, compared to the first four. Congrats! The sixth one made absolutely no sense and didn't make me laugh at all. The seventh one had a comical break, but was poorly animated. The eight one was a cheap Futurama copy, the ninth one... Oh, and why bother. There are so many!
The only one that really distinguished itself was Comick's. Apart from a majority of the other shorts included, this one had very good graphics, decent animation, nice effects and a few funny cracks (jokes).
Really, like the guy before me said, stop making those. Or at least, include only the decent shorts, because it looks like most people working on shorts for this colllab don't really put effort into it.
P.S: The last one was fine. This one, not so much.
P.P.S: Sorry for sounding so crude, but I figure I had to be.
Three'd, because of Comick's work and some other pretty good shorts. I gave you a four on the review, though, 'cause that's what the overall's worth to me.