Uhuh...
Ok, I'm not going to sit here and riticule your belifes like a lot of people have been doing on here. If I wanted to do that I'd PM you.
As for the flash. I found it very boring. No one, unles they are VERY interested, is going to it through all that text. It would help if there was animation, you would find a better audience. There really was nothing very interesting about it. In fact don't jsut add animation, spruce up the whole thing, so it isn't so boring.
Good.....
I thank you for spending the time it took to create this well thought out decision on the God question. I personal found this to my liking because I agree with your ideas on God. Being religious is as you said a thing of logic and faith. Also I have read one other review about your flash that was in my opinion distasteful and down right hateful. I would like to say you should discount this person and continue with your good work.
Lastly, I would like to ask you did you get any influence in your writing style for this flash, from Plato's Republic? Just a question.
Thanks Again.....Your Friend, JamesMeggido
Well, it's not my writing styles or ideas. It originally came from a book called, Everything you want to know about God but were too afraid to ask by Eric.
well it's good and makes a point
but most people would not bother to read it all b/c it's very long
Yes I agree it is long. It is based on a book. However, the question is: Are you willing to spare some of your time to know God better?
I'm not getting into religious arguments...
but I agree with everyone who says this doesn't belong here. Just a bunch of clicks with a bunch of text people may or not agree with.
As for the game, I hate typing games. Sorry.
Incoherent arguments in a silly format.
Since this is all text, my first thought would be to simply give it a web page.
Though, on second thought, I'm not sure it's really worthwhile taking the time to preserve it. Sorry if this is a little harsh, but it's a big heap of inane "arguments" (it almost does a disservice to the word "argument" to call them that), and superstition. The even manages to be self-contradictory in many places, occasionally noticing this fact and attempting to weasel away with something along the lines of "it's a big mystery that we'll probably never solve".
I could iterate all the places where the arguments fail, but the better ones are not new, and have been refuted in many places elsewhere, and the worse ones could be refuted by any rational person without too much work.