very hard
all i can kill is 5% then i lose this game is very hard can u beat it?
Reviews for "Pandemic: EoM"
Blips responds:
Yup, I've beet the game many times.
Meh. Worser than the previous one.
Like the previous reviewer said, the results are waaaaaaaaaaay too random. It could take anywhere from 1-20 tries to infect a new country, and upgrading your virus seemed to do jack. It's just not fun when you pour all your points into something and get absolutely nothing. Also, I don't think the music fit as well as in the previous game.
Nice try, but you sort of killed it.
Not bad
but too easy, I barely had to try and I wiped out the global population
Not bad for a sequel
Hmmm well this game has some good points and some bad just like the original. I was disappointed i couldn't choose the symptoms of my virus anymore, but the realism of this one was a little bit better than the original (albeit somewhat annoying). Getting the virus to travel to the island nations is a little too difficult and the pure dumb luck thing kinda got on my nerves. I keep trying to bear in mind that wiping out all of mankind would not be an easy thing for a micro-organism to do but then again games that are TOO real aren't much fun are they?
As for graphics and sound they're a little above average in my opinion but not by much although i will say i did like the song in the background I thought it was an appropriate melody for the whole world dying but it got a little annoying. I suggest maybe a fake newscast or a statement from a political leader or two somewhere in the game to kind of break up the monotony. All in all a decent sequel if somewhat disappointing.
it was ok..
the others in the series were better. but this was a good attempt to change how you actually infect the world. the instructions weren't really good and could have more actual instructions on what the buttons mean.